Application of SAR-Optical fusion to extract shoreline position from Cloud-Contaminated satellite images

Shorelines derived from optical satellite images are increasingly being used for regional to global scale analysis of sandy coastline dynamics. The optical satellite record, however, is contaminated by cloud cover, which can substantially reduce the temporal resolution of available images for shoreline analysis. Meanwhile, with the development of deep learning methods, optical images are increasingly fused with Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images that are unaffected by clouds to reconstruct the cloud-contaminated pixels. Such SAR-Optical fusion methods have been shown successful for different land surface applications, but the unique characteristics of coastal areas make the applicability of this method unknown in these dynamic zones. Herein we apply a deep internal learning (DIL) method to reconstruct cloud-contaminated optical images and explore its applicability to retrieve shorelines obscured by clouds. Our approach uses a mixed sequence of SAR and Gaussian noise images as the prior and the cloudy Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI) as the target. The DIL encodes the target with priors and synthesizes plausible pixels under cloud cover. A unique aspect of our workflow is the inclusion of Gaussian noise in the prior sequence for MNDWI images when SAR images collected within a 1-day temporal lag are not available. A novel loss function of DIL model is also introduced to optimize the image reconstruction near the shoreline. These new developments have significant contribution to the model accuracy. The DIL method is tested at four different sites with varying tide, wave, and shoreline dynamics. Shorelines derived from the reconstructed and true MNDWI images are compared to quantify the internal accuracy of shoreline reconstruction. For microtidal environments with mean springs tidal range less than 2 m, the mean absolute error (MAE) of shoreline reconstruction is less than 7.5 m with the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) more than 0.78 regardless of shoreline and wave dynamics. The method is less skilful in macro- and mesotidal environments due to the larger water level difference in the paired optical and SAR images, resulting in the MAE of 12.59 m and R 2 of 0.43. The proposed SAR-Optical fusion method demonstrates substantially better accuracy in retrieving cloud-obscured shoreline positions compared to interpolation methods relying solely on optical images. Results from our work highlight the great potential of SAR-Optical fusion to derive shorelines even under the cloudiest conditions, thus increasing the temporal resolution of shoreline datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.01.013
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of SAR-Optical fusion to extract shoreline position from Cloud-Contaminated satellite images

Yongjing Mao, Kristen D. Splinter
4 citations
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation
2.01
article

Application of SAR-Optical fusion to extract shoreline position from Cloud-Contaminated satellite images

Yongjing Mao, Kristen D. Splinter
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Shorelines derived from optical satellite images are increasingly being used for regional to global scale analysis of sandy coastline dynamics. The optical satellite record, however, is contaminated by cloud cover, which can substantially reduce the temporal resolution of available images for shoreline analysis. Meanwhile, with the development of deep learning methods, optical images are increasingly fused with Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images that are unaffected by clouds to reconstruct the cloud-contaminated pixels. Such SAR-Optical fusion methods have been shown successful for different land surface applications, but the unique characteristics of coastal areas make the applicability of this method unknown in these dynamic zones. Herein we apply a deep internal learning (DIL) method to reconstruct cloud-contaminated optical images and explore its applicability to retrieve shorelines obscured by clouds. Our approach uses a mixed sequence of SAR and Gaussian noise images as the prior and the cloudy Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI) as the target. The DIL encodes the target with priors and synthesizes plausible pixels under cloud cover. A unique aspect of our workflow is the inclusion of Gaussian noise in the prior sequence for MNDWI images when SAR images collected within a 1-day temporal lag are not available. A novel loss function of DIL model is also introduced to optimize the image reconstruction near the shoreline. These new developments have significant contribution to the model accuracy. The DIL method is tested at four different sites with varying tide, wave, and shoreline dynamics. Shorelines derived from the reconstructed and true MNDWI images are compared to quantify the internal accuracy of shoreline reconstruction. For microtidal environments with mean springs tidal range less than 2 m, the mean absolute error (MAE) of shoreline reconstruction is less than 7.5 m with the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) more than 0.78 regardless of shoreline and wave dynamics. The method is less skilful in macro- and mesotidal environments due to the larger water level difference in the paired optical and SAR images, resulting in the MAE of 12.59 m and R 2 of 0.43. The proposed SAR-Optical fusion method demonstrates substantially better accuracy in retrieving cloud-obscured shoreline positions compared to interpolation methods relying solely on optical images. Results from our work highlight the great potential of SAR-Optical fusion to derive shorelines even under the cloudiest conditions, thus increasing the temporal resolution of shoreline datasets.

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote SensingVol. 220
UNSW Sydney (AU)
U.S. Geological Survey, Australian Research Council
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.