Does the future imagination treatment affect people’s pro-environmental intention and donation decisions?

This study investigates the impact of a future imagination treatment on individuals’ pro-environmental intentions and donation behaviors, utilizing the theory of planned behavior (TPB) as a framework. A total of 442 students from National Chengchi University participated in the research, which involved an experimental group that envisioned living conditions in the year 2100 and a control group. Employing seemingly unrelated regressions and a three-stage least squares model, we analyzed the donation decisions in the context of a dictator game (Camerer in Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction, Princeton University Press, 2011). The results revealed that the imaginary-trip-to-the-future treatment did not significantly impact pro-environmental donations. However, individuals’ intentions to mitigate climate change were positively correlated with their decisions to contribute to climate change initiatives. Additionally, key factors such as attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and futurability were found to significantly influence these intentions, highlighting the intergenerational sustainability dilemma. These findings enhance our understanding of the complexities surrounding pro-environmental behavior and suggest potential avenues for future research aimed at promoting environmental sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment Development and Sustainability
Published
2025-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-05967-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the future imagination treatment affect people’s pro-environmental intention and donation decisions?

Daigee Shaw, Ming-Feng Hung, Bin‐Tzong Chie, Tianguo Yuan et al.
2 citations
Environment Development and Sustainability
Behavioral Health and Interventions
3.09
article

Does the future imagination treatment affect people’s pro-environmental intention and donation decisions?

Daigee Shaw, Ming-Feng Hung, Bin‐Tzong Chie, Tianguo Yuan, Yen‐Lien Kuo, H. L. Chen, Chiung Ting Chang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of a future imagination treatment on individuals’ pro-environmental intentions and donation behaviors, utilizing the theory of planned behavior (TPB) as a framework. A total of 442 students from National Chengchi University participated in the research, which involved an experimental group that envisioned living conditions in the year 2100 and a control group. Employing seemingly unrelated regressions and a three-stage least squares model, we analyzed the donation decisions in the context of a dictator game (Camerer in Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction, Princeton University Press, 2011). The results revealed that the imaginary-trip-to-the-future treatment did not significantly impact pro-environmental donations. However, individuals’ intentions to mitigate climate change were positively correlated with their decisions to contribute to climate change initiatives. Additionally, key factors such as attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and futurability were found to significantly influence these intentions, highlighting the intergenerational sustainability dilemma. These findings enhance our understanding of the complexities surrounding pro-environmental behavior and suggest potential avenues for future research aimed at promoting environmental sustainability.

Environment Development and Sustainability
Tamkang University (TW), National Sun Yat-sen University (TW), Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica (TW), National Chengchi University (TW), National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Academia Sinica, Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.