Worldview, Mentality and aspirations of Uman peasants on the eve of the new year, 1906 (based on the materials of the Central provincial committee meeting in Kyiv on december 21, 1905)

The purpose of this study is to characterize the social attitudes of Ukrainian peasantry at the end of 1905 based on historical sources and scholarly literature. The research methodology is based on general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, principles of historicism, comprehensiveness, systematicity, interdisciplinarity, as well as specific historical methods, including historical-genetic, historical-comparative, historical-typological, content analysis, and historical-systemic methods. The scientific novelty lies in the use of a little-known historical source the materials from the Central Provincial Committee meeting on December 21, 1905, in Kyiv and scholarly literature to characterize the mental orientations shaping the social attitudes of Ukrainian peasantry in December 1905. Conclusions. The analysis of the meeting materials enabled an exploration of the peculiarities of the Ukrainian peasantry's mentality and attitudes during the First Russian Revolution. Some farmers expressed support for the tsarist autocracy, while others advocated for peasant self-governance without the involvement of officials and police. Relationships with other social and ethnic groups were shaped by mental orientations, with the peasant ideal rooted in physical labour on one’s own land. Thus, redistribution of state, landowner, and church lands was seen as a means to address the land question. As Jews did not engage in direct agricultural labour but instead, in the peasants’ view, conducted "undesirable" activities (such as trade and land leasing), a negative attitude ("collective shadow") formed, with peasants denying them the right to land ownership.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Papers of the Kamianets-Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiienko University History
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32626/2309-2254.2024-44.156-171
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Worldview, Mentality and aspirations of Uman peasants on the eve of the new year, 1906 (based on the materials of the Central provincial committee meeting in Kyiv on december 21, 1905)

Oleksandr Fedkov, Антон Гаук
1 links
Scientific Papers of the Kamianets-Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiienko University History
Soviet and Russian History
article

Worldview, Mentality and aspirations of Uman peasants on the eve of the new year, 1906 (based on the materials of the Central provincial committee meeting in Kyiv on december 21, 1905)

Oleksandr Fedkov, Антон Гаук
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to characterize the social attitudes of Ukrainian peasantry at the end of 1905 based on historical sources and scholarly literature. The research methodology is based on general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, principles of historicism, comprehensiveness, systematicity, interdisciplinarity, as well as specific historical methods, including historical-genetic, historical-comparative, historical-typological, content analysis, and historical-systemic methods. The scientific novelty lies in the use of a little-known historical source the materials from the Central Provincial Committee meeting on December 21, 1905, in Kyiv and scholarly literature to characterize the mental orientations shaping the social attitudes of Ukrainian peasantry in December 1905. Conclusions. The analysis of the meeting materials enabled an exploration of the peculiarities of the Ukrainian peasantry's mentality and attitudes during the First Russian Revolution. Some farmers expressed support for the tsarist autocracy, while others advocated for peasant self-governance without the involvement of officials and police. Relationships with other social and ethnic groups were shaped by mental orientations, with the peasant ideal rooted in physical labour on one’s own land. Thus, redistribution of state, landowner, and church lands was seen as a means to address the land question. As Jews did not engage in direct agricultural labour but instead, in the peasants’ view, conducted "undesirable" activities (such as trade and land leasing), a negative attitude ("collective shadow") formed, with peasants denying them the right to land ownership.

Scientific Papers of the Kamianets-Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiienko University HistoryVol. 44
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.