Left to their own devices: the significance of mental health apps on the construction of therapy and care

Abstract Mental health (MH) mobile apps offer convenient, low/no-cost automated psychological support. Little is known about what this technology does to the very definition of MH care. Looking through a post-phenomenological lens (Idhe, 1991), we examine how the app's materiality mediates the construction of psychological care. Through interviews with MH app users, analysis revealed that users experienced a detached and abstract kind of care, which ignored their real-life circumstances and particulars, and was not sensitive to the complex, context-dependent nature of their problems. Instead, the apps amplified a mechanistic and individualistic idea of psychological wellbeing. Meanwhile, the apps concealed the importance of interpersonal understanding, healing spaces, and sharing as meaningful parts of care. Some found this to be an impersonal and inappropriate way to deal with emotional problems, while others lamented their own inability to conform to the app’s ideals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Subjectivity
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-024-00195-w
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Left to their own devices: the significance of mental health apps on the construction of therapy and care

Jesse N. Ruse, Paul Rhodes, Ernst Schraube
7 citations
Subjectivity
Digital Mental Health Interventions
2.87
article

Left to their own devices: the significance of mental health apps on the construction of therapy and care

Jesse N. Ruse, Paul Rhodes, Ernst Schraube
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Mental health (MH) mobile apps offer convenient, low/no-cost automated psychological support. Little is known about what this technology does to the very definition of MH care. Looking through a post-phenomenological lens (Idhe, 1991), we examine how the app's materiality mediates the construction of psychological care. Through interviews with MH app users, analysis revealed that users experienced a detached and abstract kind of care, which ignored their real-life circumstances and particulars, and was not sensitive to the complex, context-dependent nature of their problems. Instead, the apps amplified a mechanistic and individualistic idea of psychological wellbeing. Meanwhile, the apps concealed the importance of interpersonal understanding, healing spaces, and sharing as meaningful parts of care. Some found this to be an impersonal and inappropriate way to deal with emotional problems, while others lamented their own inability to conform to the app’s ideals.

SubjectivityVol. 31(4)
Roskilde University (DK), The University of Sydney (AU)
University of Sydney
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
2.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.