Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Hinaan Masyarakat Sebagai Alasan Meringankan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Keadilan (Studi Putusan Nomor 29/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/Pn.Jkt.Pst)

This research aims to analyze the judge's consideration of public insults as a reason to reduce criminal sentences in cases of criminal acts of corruption based on Decision Number: 29/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/PN.Jkt.Pst. The research method used is normative juridical research with a case study approach. Primary data was obtained through court decision documents, while secondary data was collected from relevant legal literature, journals and other legal sources. The results of the research show that in the judge's consideration, public insults are often used as one of the reasons for mitigating criminal sentences. This is based on the view that social pressure and negative stigma from society can have a significant psychological effect on the defendant, which in some cases can be considered a form of additional punishment beyond the sentence imposed by the court. In the decision studied, the judge considered that the defendant had experienced severe social pressure due to insults and ridicule from society, which was then used as a reason to reduce the criminal sentence imposed. This research also found that the use of public insults as a reason to reduce criminal sentences still raises pros and cons among legal practitioners and academics. Some parties argue that this reason should not be used because it can reduce the deterrent effect of criminal punishment. On the other hand, other parties argue that these considerations need to be taken into account to provide more humane justice for the defendant. The conclusion of this research is that the judge's consideration of public insults as a reason to reduce criminal sentences has a strong basis in an effort to achieve a balance between legal justice and social justice. However, there needs to be clearer and more consistent guidelines in the application of these reasons to ensure objective and equitable justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58540/jih.v1i1.620
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Hinaan Masyarakat Sebagai Alasan Meringankan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Keadilan (Studi Putusan Nomor 29/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/Pn.Jkt.Pst)

Insan Tajali Nur, Lucky Hawanda Paonganan, Khristyawan Wisnu Wardana
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Hinaan Masyarakat Sebagai Alasan Meringankan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Keadilan (Studi Putusan Nomor 29/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/Pn.Jkt.Pst)

Insan Tajali Nur, Lucky Hawanda Paonganan, Khristyawan Wisnu Wardana
article en

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the judge's consideration of public insults as a reason to reduce criminal sentences in cases of criminal acts of corruption based on Decision Number: 29/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/PN.Jkt.Pst. The research method used is normative juridical research with a case study approach. Primary data was obtained through court decision documents, while secondary data was collected from relevant legal literature, journals and other legal sources. The results of the research show that in the judge's consideration, public insults are often used as one of the reasons for mitigating criminal sentences. This is based on the view that social pressure and negative stigma from society can have a significant psychological effect on the defendant, which in some cases can be considered a form of additional punishment beyond the sentence imposed by the court. In the decision studied, the judge considered that the defendant had experienced severe social pressure due to insults and ridicule from society, which was then used as a reason to reduce the criminal sentence imposed. This research also found that the use of public insults as a reason to reduce criminal sentences still raises pros and cons among legal practitioners and academics. Some parties argue that this reason should not be used because it can reduce the deterrent effect of criminal punishment. On the other hand, other parties argue that these considerations need to be taken into account to provide more humane justice for the defendant. The conclusion of this research is that the judge's consideration of public insults as a reason to reduce criminal sentences has a strong basis in an effort to achieve a balance between legal justice and social justice. However, there needs to be clearer and more consistent guidelines in the application of these reasons to ensure objective and equitable justice.

Jurnal Ilmu HukumVol. 1(1)
Mulawarman University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Hinaan Masyarakat Sebagai Alasan Meringankan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Keadilan (Studi Putusan Nomor 29/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/Pn.Jkt.Pst) — Insan Tajali Nur, Lucky Hawanda Paonganan, et al. · Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS