An ESG-Centered Evaluation Scheme for ODA Projects

This study proposes an ESG-centered evaluation scheme for ODA projects. As of 2022, KOICA’s ODA evaluation indicators determine the success of the ODA project in terms of the donor country’s perspective. This implies a need to reorganize the evaluation indicators to include the recipient country’s perspective. In other words, the process and results of the ODA project should also be evaluated in terms of the recipient country’s environmental, social, and governance (ESG) conditions. As illustrated by the cases of the UN, Denmark, and Sweden, it is confirmed that it is necessary to convert the evaluation scheme of ODA projects to an ESG-centered evaluation plan. Furthermore, this study discusses three basic directions in establishing ESG-centered ODA evaluation indicators: reclassification of existing evaluation indicators into ESG, participation of various stakeholders, and evaluation of the planning-process-results of ODA projects according to the value chain approach. According to the discussions above, the ESG-centered evaluation plan for ODA projects consists of three parts, including considerations at the business planning stage, considerations at the project progress stage, and considerations at the project completion stage. Furthermore, indicators that should be considered in the evaluation at each stage are divided into G (governance), E (environmental), and S (social). Although many items are reclassified from existing evaluation schemes, it is emphasized that especially concerning governance, new indicators that can reflect the opinions of diverse stakeholders, such as the government of the recipient country, local citizens of the recipient country, and private companies in the donor country, should be additionally considered.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global and Area Studies(JGA)
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31720/jga.8.4.14
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An ESG-Centered Evaluation Scheme for ODA Projects

Ki-bum Kwon, Nam Kwon Mun, Taeyoung Yoo
Journal of Global and Area Studies(JGA)
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
article

An ESG-Centered Evaluation Scheme for ODA Projects

Ki-bum Kwon, Nam Kwon Mun, Taeyoung Yoo
article en

Abstract

This study proposes an ESG-centered evaluation scheme for ODA projects. As of 2022, KOICA’s ODA evaluation indicators determine the success of the ODA project in terms of the donor country’s perspective. This implies a need to reorganize the evaluation indicators to include the recipient country’s perspective. In other words, the process and results of the ODA project should also be evaluated in terms of the recipient country’s environmental, social, and governance (ESG) conditions. As illustrated by the cases of the UN, Denmark, and Sweden, it is confirmed that it is necessary to convert the evaluation scheme of ODA projects to an ESG-centered evaluation plan. Furthermore, this study discusses three basic directions in establishing ESG-centered ODA evaluation indicators: reclassification of existing evaluation indicators into ESG, participation of various stakeholders, and evaluation of the planning-process-results of ODA projects according to the value chain approach. According to the discussions above, the ESG-centered evaluation plan for ODA projects consists of three parts, including considerations at the business planning stage, considerations at the project progress stage, and considerations at the project completion stage. Furthermore, indicators that should be considered in the evaluation at each stage are divided into G (governance), E (environmental), and S (social). Although many items are reclassified from existing evaluation schemes, it is emphasized that especially concerning governance, new indicators that can reflect the opinions of diverse stakeholders, such as the government of the recipient country, local citizens of the recipient country, and private companies in the donor country, should be additionally considered.

Journal of Global and Area Studies(JGA)Vol. 8(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.