A Trial Study on the Re-establishment of Korean Word Classification Systems

In this paper, we discussed what should be considered when re-establishing the system of classifying Korean words by comprehensively reviewing various issues raised in the formal classification of Korean lexical words. The summary of the discussions in this paper is as follows. First, we pointed out that the concept of the morpheme is still valid when classifying Korean words, and it is more reasonable in many respects to view morphemes as listeme. Second, certain blends that blend formatives, which are difficult to judge synchronically as morphemes, make it challenging to determine whether they are simple words or complex words. To rationally describe such cases, we proposed the concept of simplexhood and pointed out that Korean blends can be classified as simple words, quasi-simplex, or compound words depending on their type. Third, certain compound words that directly contain elements such as affixoid, word-formation exclusive elements, blends formatives, functional verbs, and affix-like words are difficult to distinguish as either compounds or derivatives. We proposed the concept of affixhood to measure the degree of affixhood in various grammatical units in Korean and argued that some compound words in Korean, showing characteristics of both derivatives and compound, can be classified as quasi-derivative. Fourth, we pointed out that classifying words based on the concepts of simplexhood and affixhood is useful for synchronically describing units undergoing lexicalization or grammaticalization, or in explaining how words belonging to the same category may exhibit different characteristics.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51157/kmor.2024.26.2.116
Primary Topic
Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Trial Study on the Re-establishment of Korean Word Classification Systems

Gyuhwan Oh
Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
article

A Trial Study on the Re-establishment of Korean Word Classification Systems

Gyuhwan Oh
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we discussed what should be considered when re-establishing the system of classifying Korean words by comprehensively reviewing various issues raised in the formal classification of Korean lexical words. The summary of the discussions in this paper is as follows. First, we pointed out that the concept of the morpheme is still valid when classifying Korean words, and it is more reasonable in many respects to view morphemes as listeme. Second, certain blends that blend formatives, which are difficult to judge synchronically as morphemes, make it challenging to determine whether they are simple words or complex words. To rationally describe such cases, we proposed the concept of simplexhood and pointed out that Korean blends can be classified as simple words, quasi-simplex, or compound words depending on their type. Third, certain compound words that directly contain elements such as affixoid, word-formation exclusive elements, blends formatives, functional verbs, and affix-like words are difficult to distinguish as either compounds or derivatives. We proposed the concept of affixhood to measure the degree of affixhood in various grammatical units in Korean and argued that some compound words in Korean, showing characteristics of both derivatives and compound, can be classified as quasi-derivative. Fourth, we pointed out that classifying words based on the concepts of simplexhood and affixhood is useful for synchronically describing units undergoing lexicalization or grammaticalization, or in explaining how words belonging to the same category may exhibit different characteristics.

Vol. 26(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.