Revisiting the Formation Process of Acronyms: Focusing on ACE-Type Acronyms

This study revisits the formation process of acronyms, and examines ACE-type Sino-Korean acronyms (derived from expressions structured AB CDE). The formation of these acronyms involves the process of “selection + combination.” The “selection” phase is divided into “Selection[word]” and “Selection[syllable].” The former entails selecting essential words from the entire original expression, while the latter identifies representative syllables within each selected word. The “combination” phase then involves merging the selected syllables to form a new word, which retains the original meaning but adopts a different form. When the original expression is a predicate phrase, this combination process may induce a limited nominal shift, bearing some similarity to derivation. Thus, the additional selection of “C” in the ACE-type acronyms can be explained by the following factors: (1) to avoid blocking by preexisting two-syllable Sino-Korean words, and (2) to ensure a clear recognition of the Sino-Korean suffixal “E.”

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51157/kmor.2024.26.2.174
Primary Topic
Lexicography and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Formation Process of Acronyms: Focusing on ACE-Type Acronyms

G. Cho
Lexicography and Language Studies
article

Revisiting the Formation Process of Acronyms: Focusing on ACE-Type Acronyms

G. Cho
article en

Abstract

This study revisits the formation process of acronyms, and examines ACE-type Sino-Korean acronyms (derived from expressions structured AB CDE). The formation of these acronyms involves the process of “selection + combination.” The “selection” phase is divided into “Selection[word]” and “Selection[syllable].” The former entails selecting essential words from the entire original expression, while the latter identifies representative syllables within each selected word. The “combination” phase then involves merging the selected syllables to form a new word, which retains the original meaning but adopts a different form. When the original expression is a predicate phrase, this combination process may induce a limited nominal shift, bearing some similarity to derivation. Thus, the additional selection of “C” in the ACE-type acronyms can be explained by the following factors: (1) to avoid blocking by preexisting two-syllable Sino-Korean words, and (2) to ensure a clear recognition of the Sino-Korean suffixal “E.”

Vol. 26(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Lexicography and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.