A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF NEWER COMPOSITE MATERIALS IN DIRECT RESTORATIONS: CLINICAL AND LABORATORY PERSPECTIVES

Background: This study evaluates the performance of newer composite materials in direct dental restorations from both clinical and laboratory perspectives. Advances in composite technology have focused on improving aesthetic outcomes, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility.Objective: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the physical, mechanical, and clinical performance of these materials.Methods: A mixed-method approach involving clinical trials on 80 patients and laboratory evaluations was conducted from June 2018 to June 2019. Materials tested included nanohybrid, bulk-fill, microfilled, and universal composites. Clinical performance was assessed through patient satisfaction, aesthetic outcomes, and restoration longevity. Laboratory testing focused on compressive strength, flexural strength, and wear resistance.Results: The results demonstrated significant variations in performance based on composition and application. Nanohybrid composites showed superior aesthetics and wear resistance, while bulk-fill composites excelled in compressive strength. Microfilled composites offered good polishability but lower mechanical strength, and universal composites provided balanced performance.Conclusion: Findings emphasize the importance of material selection for optimal restorative outcomes based on clinical requirements.