Indicators of noise damage: Association between lifetime noise-exposure questionnaire, high-frequency audiogram, and categorical loudness scaling

Some effects of noise-induced hearing loss may be evident at the neural level, such as cochlear synaptopathy but not necessarily manifest at the audiogram level (0.25–8 kHz); although indicators of early noise-induced hearing loss may be observable at higher audiometric frequencies. The current study compares two populations; both populations have normal hearing up to 8 kHz; however, one population has minimal lifetime exposure history for high-level noise, and the second population has previous and ongoing significant noise-exposure history. The individual‘s experience of noise exposure is assessed with a structured interview approach eliciting the level and duration across a range of noise exposure activities. Categorical loudness scaling (CLS) is used to quantify individual loudness perception. The slope of the low-level portion of the CLS function may be associated with increasing audiometric threshold. Different fitting procedures for the CLS were evaluated. The CLS slopes were compared with audiograms (0.25-16 kHz) as well as two evaluations of uncomfortable loudness levels (ULL); one using the traditional audiometric tonal stimuli and the second using the CLS broadband noise stimuli. This study investigates the extent to which noise damage can be deduced from a lifetime noise-exposure questionnaire, high-frequency audiogram, and categorical loudness scaling data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035051
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indicators of noise damage: Association between lifetime noise-exposure questionnaire, high-frequency audiogram, and categorical loudness scaling

Vit Drga, Jesko L. Verhey, Ifat Yasin, Leny Vinceslas
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Noise Effects and Management
article

Indicators of noise damage: Association between lifetime noise-exposure questionnaire, high-frequency audiogram, and categorical loudness scaling

Vit Drga, Jesko L. Verhey, Ifat Yasin, Leny Vinceslas
article en

Abstract

Some effects of noise-induced hearing loss may be evident at the neural level, such as cochlear synaptopathy but not necessarily manifest at the audiogram level (0.25–8 kHz); although indicators of early noise-induced hearing loss may be observable at higher audiometric frequencies. The current study compares two populations; both populations have normal hearing up to 8 kHz; however, one population has minimal lifetime exposure history for high-level noise, and the second population has previous and ongoing significant noise-exposure history. The individual‘s experience of noise exposure is assessed with a structured interview approach eliciting the level and duration across a range of noise exposure activities. Categorical loudness scaling (CLS) is used to quantify individual loudness perception. The slope of the low-level portion of the CLS function may be associated with increasing audiometric threshold. Different fitting procedures for the CLS were evaluated. The CLS slopes were compared with audiograms (0.25-16 kHz) as well as two evaluations of uncomfortable loudness levels (ULL); one using the traditional audiometric tonal stimuli and the second using the CLS broadband noise stimuli. This study investigates the extent to which noise damage can be deduced from a lifetime noise-exposure questionnaire, high-frequency audiogram, and categorical loudness scaling data.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 156(4_Supplement)
University College London (GB), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.