A comparative study of flutes II

This is part two of the previous presentation on flute acoustics. This talk will expand on the individual observations of each of the six flutes to include a cross-instrument comparison. Factors used in the comparison include instrument range, material, geometry, and instrument types. Findings conclude that material had the predicted effect on tone and geometry was more significant than predicted. Additional findings and confirmation of these from the NW anechoic chamber will be discussed, as well. These comparative findings are significant as they provide insight into the physics of the sound produced in each instrument and how that contributes to the unique tone of each instrument. This is significant for musicians, including flute players and composers, as predicting and manipulating the tone of different flutes is instrumental in making music, from knowing how to make, play, and compose for flutes, including when choosing what flute instruments are applicable in certain musical settings. This talk will also discuss possible extensions of this project, including to extended members of the flute family, and more note ranges tested on each instrument.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035144
Primary Topic
Music Technology and Sound Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of flutes II

Amanda S. Newton, Gordon P. Ramsey
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Music Technology and Sound Studies
article

A comparative study of flutes II

Amanda S. Newton, Gordon P. Ramsey
article en

Abstract

This is part two of the previous presentation on flute acoustics. This talk will expand on the individual observations of each of the six flutes to include a cross-instrument comparison. Factors used in the comparison include instrument range, material, geometry, and instrument types. Findings conclude that material had the predicted effect on tone and geometry was more significant than predicted. Additional findings and confirmation of these from the NW anechoic chamber will be discussed, as well. These comparative findings are significant as they provide insight into the physics of the sound produced in each instrument and how that contributes to the unique tone of each instrument. This is significant for musicians, including flute players and composers, as predicting and manipulating the tone of different flutes is instrumental in making music, from knowing how to make, play, and compose for flutes, including when choosing what flute instruments are applicable in certain musical settings. This talk will also discuss possible extensions of this project, including to extended members of the flute family, and more note ranges tested on each instrument.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 156(4_Supplement)
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Music Technology and Sound Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparative study of flutes II — Amanda S. Newton, Gordon P. Ramsey · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS