Remote characterization of auditory and cognitive processing

Previous research has demonstrated that remote testing of suprathreshold auditory function using distributed technologies can produce results that closely match those obtained in laboratory settings with a specialized, calibrated equipment. This work has facilitated internet-based recruitment of participants and the validation of various behavioral measures that provide valuable insights into auditory function. These measures include aspects of auditory processing, self-reported hearing difficulties, and cognition. In this study, we used the portable psychophysics assessment tool (PART) along with online participant recruitment to test a wide variety of audition-relevant measures in those with (n = 92) and without (n = 100) self-reported hearing loss. We assessed each measure’s ability to discriminate between these two groups, as well as their reliability and multi-variate relationships. We found that several measures of auditory processing effectively differentiated between the groups. All previously tested measures showed similar test–retest reliabilities with this online approach. Additionally, multi-variate relationships, including cognition and self-reported hearing, were strikingly consistent across groups. In sum, this work further validates remote testing as a reliable general methodology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035231
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remote characterization of auditory and cognitive processing

Aaron R. Seitz, G. Christopher Stecker, Audrey A. Carrillo, Tess K. Koerner et al.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Neural Networks and Applications
article

Remote characterization of auditory and cognitive processing

Aaron R. Seitz, G. Christopher Stecker, Audrey A. Carrillo, Tess K. Koerner, E. Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera, William J. Bologna, Katherine N. Menon, Eric C. Hoover, Frederick J. Gallun
article en

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that remote testing of suprathreshold auditory function using distributed technologies can produce results that closely match those obtained in laboratory settings with a specialized, calibrated equipment. This work has facilitated internet-based recruitment of participants and the validation of various behavioral measures that provide valuable insights into auditory function. These measures include aspects of auditory processing, self-reported hearing difficulties, and cognition. In this study, we used the portable psychophysics assessment tool (PART) along with online participant recruitment to test a wide variety of audition-relevant measures in those with (n = 92) and without (n = 100) self-reported hearing loss. We assessed each measure’s ability to discriminate between these two groups, as well as their reliability and multi-variate relationships. We found that several measures of auditory processing effectively differentiated between the groups. All previously tested measures showed similar test–retest reliabilities with this online approach. Additionally, multi-variate relationships, including cognition and self-reported hearing, were strikingly consistent across groups. In sum, this work further validates remote testing as a reliable general methodology.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 156(4_Supplement)
Northeastern University (US), Boys Town (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Boys Town National Research Hospital (US), Towson University (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Neural Networks and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.