The results and uses of a New Interlaboratory Study for ASTM E90 for frequently constructed wall types

How does one compare test reports from two different labs? How do we improve our standard test methods? How does a lab prove they get the same results over time? Every ASTM standard method is required to include a precision and bias statement. The precision statement is based on interlaboratory studies where multiple labs do repeated tests on the same sample. That data was only relevant when it is similar to the type of sample usually tested. The last interlaboratory study to establish the precision for ASTM E90 was completed over 20 years ago on low-STC steel panels. This presentation covers the initial results of a new study that included over 80% of North American accredited labs using higher-performing, commonly used, steel stud wall assemblies. The authors will present the uncertainty determined by the study along with sources of variation between the labs including opening size, microphone type, and room volumes. The presentation will also discuss how consultants can use this information to better evaluate laboratory test data, and the industry as a whole can use it to improve the reliability of acoustic testing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035183
Primary Topic
Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The results and uses of a New Interlaboratory Study for ASTM E90 for frequently constructed wall types

Evelyn Way, Michael Raley
4 links
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
article

The results and uses of a New Interlaboratory Study for ASTM E90 for frequently constructed wall types

Evelyn Way, Michael Raley
article en

Abstract

How does one compare test reports from two different labs? How do we improve our standard test methods? How does a lab prove they get the same results over time? Every ASTM standard method is required to include a precision and bias statement. The precision statement is based on interlaboratory studies where multiple labs do repeated tests on the same sample. That data was only relevant when it is similar to the type of sample usually tested. The last interlaboratory study to establish the precision for ASTM E90 was completed over 20 years ago on low-STC steel panels. This presentation covers the initial results of a new study that included over 80% of North American accredited labs using higher-performing, commonly used, steel stud wall assemblies. The authors will present the uncertainty determined by the study along with sources of variation between the labs including opening size, microphone type, and room volumes. The presentation will also discuss how consultants can use this information to better evaluate laboratory test data, and the industry as a whole can use it to improve the reliability of acoustic testing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 156(4_Supplement)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.