Diotic narrowband noises can be perceived as intracranially off center in listeners with symmetrical audiometric thresholds

The ability to localize sound sources in the horizontal plane depends on the interaural time (ITD) and level (ILD) difference. It is assumed that individuals with normal and symmetrical hearing thresholds perceive stimuli with zero ILD and ITD as fused centered auditory images, which is not always true. This study aimed to explore ILD lateralization biases in individuals with normal hearing and explain whether they can be explained byan interaural asymmetry in monaural loudness. An ILD lateralization task was performed where the ILDs ranged between ±10 dB. The stimulus was a 1-equivalent-rectangular-bandwidth narrowband noise centered at 250–8000 Hz or a wideband noise. Preliminary results showed that the participants exhibited ILD lateralization biases more often at higher frequencies and minimal bias in the wideband condition. These biases were not caused by headphones, as the transducers were reversed between testing blocks. Biases were also consistent across up to three separate testing days. A loudness balancing task showed that participants perceived stimuli as equally loud, ruling out interaural asymmetry in monaural loudness. Audiometry also confirmed the absence of hearing threshold asymmetries. Therefore, lateralization biases in individuals with normal hearing are not explained by interaural disparities in loudness perception or hearing threshold asymmetry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035155
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diotic narrowband noises can be perceived as intracranially off center in listeners with symmetrical audiometric thresholds

Matthew J. Goupell, Obada J. AlQasem
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Noise Effects and Management
article

Diotic narrowband noises can be perceived as intracranially off center in listeners with symmetrical audiometric thresholds

Matthew J. Goupell, Obada J. AlQasem
article en

Abstract

The ability to localize sound sources in the horizontal plane depends on the interaural time (ITD) and level (ILD) difference. It is assumed that individuals with normal and symmetrical hearing thresholds perceive stimuli with zero ILD and ITD as fused centered auditory images, which is not always true. This study aimed to explore ILD lateralization biases in individuals with normal hearing and explain whether they can be explained byan interaural asymmetry in monaural loudness. An ILD lateralization task was performed where the ILDs ranged between ±10 dB. The stimulus was a 1-equivalent-rectangular-bandwidth narrowband noise centered at 250–8000 Hz or a wideband noise. Preliminary results showed that the participants exhibited ILD lateralization biases more often at higher frequencies and minimal bias in the wideband condition. These biases were not caused by headphones, as the transducers were reversed between testing blocks. Biases were also consistent across up to three separate testing days. A loudness balancing task showed that participants perceived stimuli as equally loud, ruling out interaural asymmetry in monaural loudness. Audiometry also confirmed the absence of hearing threshold asymmetries. Therefore, lateralization biases in individuals with normal hearing are not explained by interaural disparities in loudness perception or hearing threshold asymmetry.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 156(4_Supplement)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.