Electromagnetic inversion for a baseline conductivity model at the Kemper CarbonSAFE site

Geophysics is one component of a successful monitoring strategy for carbon storage sites. Seismic surveys are a common element of these strategies, with repeat surveys occurring about every 5 years. However, seismic is expensive, the sensitivity to CO2 saturation is limited, and it requires a large footprint on the surface (Yurikov et al., 2022). Electromagnetic (EM) methods offer repeat surveys at a significantly lower cost, the ability to utilize airborne methods to increase coverage, and potentially provide enough information to increase the time between seismic surveys. Specifically, we focus on semi-airborne EM, with a grounded dipole transmitter, and airborne magnetic field receivers as described and modeled in Kohnke et al. (2023).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2172/2498356
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electromagnetic inversion for a baseline conductivity model at the Kemper CarbonSAFE site

Richard Hammack, Colton Kohnke, Yaoguo Li, Mengli Zhang et al.
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
article

Electromagnetic inversion for a baseline conductivity model at the Kemper CarbonSAFE site

Richard Hammack, Colton Kohnke, Yaoguo Li, Mengli Zhang, Noah Perkovich
article en

Abstract

Geophysics is one component of a successful monitoring strategy for carbon storage sites. Seismic surveys are a common element of these strategies, with repeat surveys occurring about every 5 years. However, seismic is expensive, the sensitivity to CO2 saturation is limited, and it requires a large footprint on the surface (Yurikov et al., 2022). Electromagnetic (EM) methods offer repeat surveys at a significantly lower cost, the ability to utilize airborne methods to increase coverage, and potentially provide enough information to increase the time between seismic surveys. Specifically, we focus on semi-airborne EM, with a grounded dipole transmitter, and airborne magnetic field receivers as described and modeled in Kohnke et al. (2023).

Colorado School of Mines (US), National Energy Technology Laboratory (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Electromagnetic inversion for a baseline conductivity model at the Kemper CarbonSAFE site — Richard Hammack, Colton Kohnke, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS