Multilevel Selection Keyboard with Huffman Encoding for Individuals with Upper Limb Disabilities

This study evaluated the performance of three keyboard layouts: T9, hierarchical character selection, and Huffman encoding-based systems. Five participants were tasked with typing six sentences, including three pangrams and three simple sentences, all in the national language to minimize language-related difficulties. The total time taken to type each sentence was recorded for analysis. The results indicate a clear hierarchy in performance, with the T9 keyboard consistently outperforming the other two layouts. The T9 keyboard proved to be the most efficient, showing significantly shorter typing times compared to the hierarchical character selection and Huffman encoding-based keyboards. Although the hierarchical keyboard was specifically designed for individuals with upper limb disabilities, it performed less effectively due to its limited number of buttons, which led to slower typing speeds. Despite these limitations, the proposed hierarchical system shows promise as an intermediate solution, offering better performance than the multilevel selection method, though it still requires further refinement to reach the efficiency level of the T9 keyboard. These findings highlight the trade-off between accessibility and performance, emphasizing the importance of continued development to optimize the proposed system for users with disabilities while maintaining competitive typing efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/fortei-icee64706.2024.10824491
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multilevel Selection Keyboard with Huffman Encoding for Individuals with Upper Limb Disabilities

Mahendra Fakhri, Putra Wisnu Agung Sucipto, Ilham Ari Elbaith Zaeni, Soraya Norma Mustika et al.
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
article

Multilevel Selection Keyboard with Huffman Encoding for Individuals with Upper Limb Disabilities

Mahendra Fakhri, Putra Wisnu Agung Sucipto, Ilham Ari Elbaith Zaeni, Soraya Norma Mustika, Dyah Lestari, Mahesa Anam Saputra
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the performance of three keyboard layouts: T9, hierarchical character selection, and Huffman encoding-based systems. Five participants were tasked with typing six sentences, including three pangrams and three simple sentences, all in the national language to minimize language-related difficulties. The total time taken to type each sentence was recorded for analysis. The results indicate a clear hierarchy in performance, with the T9 keyboard consistently outperforming the other two layouts. The T9 keyboard proved to be the most efficient, showing significantly shorter typing times compared to the hierarchical character selection and Huffman encoding-based keyboards. Although the hierarchical keyboard was specifically designed for individuals with upper limb disabilities, it performed less effectively due to its limited number of buttons, which led to slower typing speeds. Despite these limitations, the proposed hierarchical system shows promise as an intermediate solution, offering better performance than the multilevel selection method, though it still requires further refinement to reach the efficiency level of the T9 keyboard. These findings highlight the trade-off between accessibility and performance, emphasizing the importance of continued development to optimize the proposed system for users with disabilities while maintaining competitive typing efficiency.

State University of Malang (ID)
Universitas Negeri Malang
Quality Education, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.