Comparison Analysis of Forecasting Accuracy for Electricity Consumption Using Extreme Learning Machine and Backpropagation Algorithms

Accurate calculations are essential in forecasting. Therefore, it is important to select the appropriate forecasting method, which can be determined by testing the accuracy level of the forecasting results using the MAPE value. The purpose of this research is to analyze the comparison of the accuracy of electricity consumption forecasts using the Extreme Learning Machine and Backpropagation algorithms. The data used are monthly electricity consumption data as input pattern designs. The input data will be divided into two parts: training data and testing data, followed by simulations using the Extreme Learning Machine and Backpropagation algorithms to obtain the 2022 forecast results. The accuracy of each algorithm's forecast results will then be calculated using the MAPE value. The research results indicate that the Extreme Learning Machine algorithm has a MAPE value of 4.67%, where the error rate is higher than the Backpropagation algorithm, which has only 2.27%. From the algorithm testing stages, the most accurate forecasting result for electricity consumption was obtained using Backpropagation, as it has the lowest MAPE value, indicating the highest accuracy and lowest error rate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/fortei-icee64706.2024.10824578
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and ELM
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Analysis of Forecasting Accuracy for Electricity Consumption Using Extreme Learning Machine and Backpropagation Algorithms

Sutoyo Sutoyo, Zulfatri Aini, Nanda Putri Miefthawati, Shazia Akbar
Machine Learning and ELM
article

Comparison Analysis of Forecasting Accuracy for Electricity Consumption Using Extreme Learning Machine and Backpropagation Algorithms

Sutoyo Sutoyo, Zulfatri Aini, Nanda Putri Miefthawati, Shazia Akbar
article en

Abstract

Accurate calculations are essential in forecasting. Therefore, it is important to select the appropriate forecasting method, which can be determined by testing the accuracy level of the forecasting results using the MAPE value. The purpose of this research is to analyze the comparison of the accuracy of electricity consumption forecasts using the Extreme Learning Machine and Backpropagation algorithms. The data used are monthly electricity consumption data as input pattern designs. The input data will be divided into two parts: training data and testing data, followed by simulations using the Extreme Learning Machine and Backpropagation algorithms to obtain the 2022 forecast results. The accuracy of each algorithm's forecast results will then be calculated using the MAPE value. The research results indicate that the Extreme Learning Machine algorithm has a MAPE value of 4.67%, where the error rate is higher than the Backpropagation algorithm, which has only 2.27%. From the algorithm testing stages, the most accurate forecasting result for electricity consumption was obtained using Backpropagation, as it has the lowest MAPE value, indicating the highest accuracy and lowest error rate.

Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau (ID)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Machine Learning and ELM
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison Analysis of Forecasting Accuracy for Electricity Consumption Using Extreme Learning Machine and Backpropagation Algorithms — Sutoyo Sutoyo, Zulfatri Aini, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS