Pipe Cost Optimization in Water Distribution Network: An Analysis of Different Constraint Handling Methods

Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have been used to solve Water Distribution Network (WDN) Optimization problems for several decades, and several ways for resolving constrained problems have been devised. According to the no-free lunch theorem, different CHTs would perform differently on different problems due to differences in landscape, dimensionality, and ratio between the feasible search space and the entire search space. However, in WDN no work isolated the performance of different CHTs in the literature. Therefore in this work, an analysis of four well-known CHTs is presented based on 5 different case studies of WDNs. Specifically, the performance of the CHTs is analyzed in terms of pipe cost optimization of WDNs with Self-adapting differential evolution (SADE) as the core search algorithm. Results from the analysis show that certain CHTS are not suitable for WDNs and motivated the need to develop advanced variants of some CHTs to ensure their scalability to larger problem dimensions and also improve their convergence speed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ictc62082.2024.10827282
Primary Topic
Water Systems and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pipe Cost Optimization in Water Distribution Network: An Analysis of Different Constraint Handling Methods

Oladayo Solomon Ajani, Rammohan Mallipeddi, Dzeuban Fenyom Ivan, Oyeleke S. Oyeniyi
Water Systems and Optimization
article

Pipe Cost Optimization in Water Distribution Network: An Analysis of Different Constraint Handling Methods

Oladayo Solomon Ajani, Rammohan Mallipeddi, Dzeuban Fenyom Ivan, Oyeleke S. Oyeniyi
article en

Abstract

Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have been used to solve Water Distribution Network (WDN) Optimization problems for several decades, and several ways for resolving constrained problems have been devised. According to the no-free lunch theorem, different CHTs would perform differently on different problems due to differences in landscape, dimensionality, and ratio between the feasible search space and the entire search space. However, in WDN no work isolated the performance of different CHTs in the literature. Therefore in this work, an analysis of four well-known CHTs is presented based on 5 different case studies of WDNs. Specifically, the performance of the CHTs is analyzed in terms of pipe cost optimization of WDNs with Self-adapting differential evolution (SADE) as the core search algorithm. Results from the analysis show that certain CHTS are not suitable for WDNs and motivated the need to develop advanced variants of some CHTs to ensure their scalability to larger problem dimensions and also improve their convergence speed.

Kyungpook National University (KR)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Water Systems and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pipe Cost Optimization in Water Distribution Network: An Analysis of Different Constraint Handling Methods — Oladayo Solomon Ajani, Rammohan Mallipeddi, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS