Harnessing LLMs for VQA: A Prompted Benchmark with Animate/Inanimate Keywords

In the field of NLP, Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently achieved significant advancements, leading to the development of various benchmarks for their evaluation. Along-side NLP, Vision Language Models (VLMs) have also VLM have also significantly progressed, similar to LLMs. However, benchmarks for VLMs are still relatively underdeveloped compared to those for NLP, and their construction is often costly. In this work, we propose an automatically generated benchmark for evaluating VLMs based on LLMs and conduct a visual question answering task to assess this benchmark. The benchmark includes multiple-choice questions that not only distinguish between animate and inanimate objects but also generate these distinctions automatically, along with entity and object information within images. We evaluate the performance of open VLM using the generated multiple-choice questions, demonstrating the model's capabilities and the significance of the automatically generated benchmark. Finally, we discuss the necessity and future directions for benchmark research in this area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ictc62082.2024.10826596
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harnessing LLMs for VQA: A Prompted Benchmark with Animate/Inanimate Keywords

Cheoneum Park, Chanwoo Lee, Haneol Jang, Minsang Kim et al.
1 citations
Natural Language Processing Techniques
0.35
article

Harnessing LLMs for VQA: A Prompted Benchmark with Animate/Inanimate Keywords

Cheoneum Park, Chanwoo Lee, Haneol Jang, Minsang Kim, Hyun Woo Kim, Hyunjeong Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the field of NLP, Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently achieved significant advancements, leading to the development of various benchmarks for their evaluation. Along-side NLP, Vision Language Models (VLMs) have also VLM have also significantly progressed, similar to LLMs. However, benchmarks for VLMs are still relatively underdeveloped compared to those for NLP, and their construction is often costly. In this work, we propose an automatically generated benchmark for evaluating VLMs based on LLMs and conduct a visual question answering task to assess this benchmark. The benchmark includes multiple-choice questions that not only distinguish between animate and inanimate objects but also generate these distinctions automatically, along with entity and object information within images. We evaluate the performance of open VLM using the generated multiple-choice questions, demonstrating the model's capabilities and the significance of the automatically generated benchmark. Finally, we discuss the necessity and future directions for benchmark research in this area.

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (KR), Hanbat National University (KR), Korea University (KR), Seoul Women's University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Harnessing LLMs for VQA: A Prompted Benchmark with Animate/Inanimate Keywords — Cheoneum Park, Chanwoo Lee, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS