Data Drift Quantification Metrics for Month-on-Month Semiconductor Data

Semiconductor manufacturing process goes through multiple steps that produce a huge volume of wafers and chips. In order to maximize yield, a production line deploys a Quality Prediction model that can detect Critical Dimensions (CD) ahead of time. Often this is achieved using statistical and machine learning approaches. However, the probability distribution of the input training data may drift over time due to various environmental factors in the semiconductor FAB process, causing the machine learning models to fail. This necessitates a drift detection, quantification and mitigation strategy. Although data drift detection study is abundant in literature, there are relatively few established metrics for quantifying data drift. In this paper, we present a novel approach to quantify drift in the input data by adapting the DARE-GRAM method and using the latent vectors from its model training. On a semiconductor dataset with month-on-month drift, we observe a correlation of -0.39654 with RSQ and 0.56735 with RMSE, which are the metrics being used for evaluating our task of Critical Dimension prediction. The proposed solution is potentially impactful for model explainability, domain adaptation and model monitoring and root cause analysis of model performance degradation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/wintechcon61988.2024.10838038
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data Drift Quantification Metrics for Month-on-Month Semiconductor Data

Adrita Barari, Kyuhwan Kim, Hoyeon Kim, J Seo et al.
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
article

Data Drift Quantification Metrics for Month-on-Month Semiconductor Data

Adrita Barari, Kyuhwan Kim, Hoyeon Kim, J Seo, Lakshmi Narayana Pedapudi, Nandita Bhattacharya
article en

Abstract

Semiconductor manufacturing process goes through multiple steps that produce a huge volume of wafers and chips. In order to maximize yield, a production line deploys a Quality Prediction model that can detect Critical Dimensions (CD) ahead of time. Often this is achieved using statistical and machine learning approaches. However, the probability distribution of the input training data may drift over time due to various environmental factors in the semiconductor FAB process, causing the machine learning models to fail. This necessitates a drift detection, quantification and mitigation strategy. Although data drift detection study is abundant in literature, there are relatively few established metrics for quantifying data drift. In this paper, we present a novel approach to quantify drift in the input data by adapting the DARE-GRAM method and using the latent vectors from its model training. On a semiconductor dataset with month-on-month drift, we observe a correlation of -0.39654 with RSQ and 0.56735 with RMSE, which are the metrics being used for evaluating our task of Critical Dimension prediction. The proposed solution is potentially impactful for model explainability, domain adaptation and model monitoring and root cause analysis of model performance degradation.

Samsung (South Korea) (KR), Samsung (India) (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Data Drift Quantification Metrics for Month-on-Month Semiconductor Data — Adrita Barari, Kyuhwan Kim, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS