The Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on Arrhythmias: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

This double-blind randomized controlled trial investigated the effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) on cardiac arrhythmias in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Participants (n = 41) with CIEDs were randomly assigned to either the OMT group or the control group (light touch/sham) and received a one-time intervention. No significant change in arrhythmia burden was found in the 1 month following intervention (<i>P</i> = .14). Discrete heart rate (HR), HR variability (HRV), and activity data were obtained from CIEDs in 17 of 41 subjects 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30 days prior to and after intervention. No significant difference was observed. An additional short-term substudy was performed on 20 subjects at the time of the intervention (5 min prior to and after intervention), and HR, respiratory rate, blood pressure, blood oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>), and 1-min short-term HRV were compared. This study did not demonstrate an effect of OMT on arrhythmias, HR, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and blood SpO<sub>2</sub>. However, differences in OMT versus sham were observed for short-term HRV (<i>P</i> = .022) and a trend for long-term HRV. Importantly, there were no reported adverse effects with either intervention. OMT appears to be safe in cardiac patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2024.15121
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on Arrhythmias: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Todd J. Cohen, Jacqueline Nikakis, Jordan Keys, Mahima Mangla et al.
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

The Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on Arrhythmias: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Todd J. Cohen, Jacqueline Nikakis, Jordan Keys, Mahima Mangla, Sheldon C. Yao, Denis Y. Malkov, Ermin Tale, To Shan Li
article en

Abstract

This double-blind randomized controlled trial investigated the effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) on cardiac arrhythmias in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Participants (n = 41) with CIEDs were randomly assigned to either the OMT group or the control group (light touch/sham) and received a one-time intervention. No significant change in arrhythmia burden was found in the 1 month following intervention (<i>P</i> = .14). Discrete heart rate (HR), HR variability (HRV), and activity data were obtained from CIEDs in 17 of 41 subjects 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30 days prior to and after intervention. No significant difference was observed. An additional short-term substudy was performed on 20 subjects at the time of the intervention (5 min prior to and after intervention), and HR, respiratory rate, blood pressure, blood oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>), and 1-min short-term HRV were compared. This study did not demonstrate an effect of OMT on arrhythmias, HR, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and blood SpO<sub>2</sub>. However, differences in OMT versus sham were observed for short-term HRV (<i>P</i> = .022) and a trend for long-term HRV. Importantly, there were no reported adverse effects with either intervention. OMT appears to be safe in cardiac patients.

Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm ManagementVol. 15(12)
Lenox Hill Hospital (US), New York Institute of Technology (US), Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.