Stakeholder Perspectives on the IPSAS Conceptual Framework: A Comment Letter Meta-Analysis Concerning ED76, ED77 and ED on Key Characteristics

Abstract Our comment letter content analysis sheds light on stakeholder perspectives and positions on conceptual matters related to the IPSASB’s conceptual framework, covering: primary users and main objectives; qualitative characteristics; public sector specificities; financial accounting bases; and financial reporting. On aggregate, responding stakeholders did not favor a straightforward move toward a full accrual basis of accounting relying upon current value accounting measurements. Instead, they pointed to a mixed approach that combines accrual-based statements with budgetary reports, as well as historical cost and current value accounting measurements. Concerning the accounting basis (model), standard-setters appeared to prefer historical cost rather than current value, according to our clustering analysis. The evergreen principle of accountability was acknowledged as paramount, while the more recent focus on users’ information needs remained relatively neglected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2024-0101
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholder Perspectives on the IPSAS Conceptual Framework: A Comment Letter Meta-Analysis Concerning ED76, ED77 and ED on Key Characteristics

Lasse Oulasvirta, Natalia Aversano, Yuri Biondi
Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
article

Stakeholder Perspectives on the IPSAS Conceptual Framework: A Comment Letter Meta-Analysis Concerning ED76, ED77 and ED on Key Characteristics

Lasse Oulasvirta, Natalia Aversano, Yuri Biondi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Our comment letter content analysis sheds light on stakeholder perspectives and positions on conceptual matters related to the IPSASB’s conceptual framework, covering: primary users and main objectives; qualitative characteristics; public sector specificities; financial accounting bases; and financial reporting. On aggregate, responding stakeholders did not favor a straightforward move toward a full accrual basis of accounting relying upon current value accounting measurements. Instead, they pointed to a mixed approach that combines accrual-based statements with budgetary reports, as well as historical cost and current value accounting measurements. Concerning the accounting basis (model), standard-setters appeared to prefer historical cost rather than current value, according to our clustering analysis. The evergreen principle of accountability was acknowledged as paramount, while the more recent focus on users’ information needs remained relatively neglected.

Accounting Economics and Law - A ConviviumVol. 16(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Salerno (IT), Tampere University (FI), Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Sciences Sociales (FR), Université Paris Dauphine-PSL (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.