Comparative Analysis of Keypoint Detection Performance in SIFT Implementations on Small-Scale Image Datasets

Scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) is widely used as an image local feature extraction method because of its invariance to rotation, scale, and illumination change. SIFT has been implemented in different program libraries. However, studies that analyze the performance of SIFT implementations have not been conducted. This study examines the keypoint extraction of three well-known SIFT libraries, i.e., David Lowe's implementation, OpenSIFT, and vlSIFT in vlfeat. Performance analysis was conducted on multiclass small-scale image datasets to capture the sensitivity of keypoint detection. Although libraries are based on the same algorithm, their performance differs slightly. Regarding execution time and the average number of keypoints detected in each image, vlSIFT outperforms David Lowe’s library and OpenSIFT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovation Information Technology and Application (JINITA)
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35970/jinita.v6i2.2399
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Keypoint Detection Performance in SIFT Implementations on Small-Scale Image Datasets

Furizal Furizal, Suprihatin Suprihatin, Imam Riadi, Tawar Tawar et al.
2 citations
Journal of Innovation Information Technology and Application (JINITA)
Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
0.50
article

Comparative Analysis of Keypoint Detection Performance in SIFT Implementations on Small-Scale Image Datasets

Furizal Furizal, Suprihatin Suprihatin, Imam Riadi, Tawar Tawar, Arif Rahman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) is widely used as an image local feature extraction method because of its invariance to rotation, scale, and illumination change. SIFT has been implemented in different program libraries. However, studies that analyze the performance of SIFT implementations have not been conducted. This study examines the keypoint extraction of three well-known SIFT libraries, i.e., David Lowe's implementation, OpenSIFT, and vlSIFT in vlfeat. Performance analysis was conducted on multiclass small-scale image datasets to capture the sensitivity of keypoint detection. Although libraries are based on the same algorithm, their performance differs slightly. Regarding execution time and the average number of keypoints detected in each image, vlSIFT outperforms David Lowe’s library and OpenSIFT.

Journal of Innovation Information Technology and Application (JINITA)Vol. 6(2)
Autonomous University of Durango (MX)
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.