HIGH-PROFICIENCY AND LOW-PROFICIENCY LEARNERS’ COMPENSATION STRATEGIES USE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING

Compensation strategies are vital for foreign language learners to overcome difficulties in acquiring a second language. According to Oxford (1990), these strategies help learners “overcome knowledge limitations in all four skills” (p. 90), making them essential for effective language acquisition. This study investigates the preferred compensation strategies of high- and low-proficiency English learners at Jagannath University, Dhaka, Bangladesh, using a mixed-methods approach. Data collection involved the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) questionnaire designed by Oxford, alongside semi-structured interviews to enrich the qualitative findings. Results indicate distinct preferences based on proficiency levels: high-proficiency learners frequently employed Strategy 6: “If I can’t think of an SL word, I use a word or phrase that means the same thing” (40%). Meanwhile, low-proficiency learners favored Strategy 1: “To understand unfamiliar SL words, I make guesses” (66.66%). These findings highlight the significance of adapting teaching approaches to address diverse learner needs, ultimately enhancing language learning efficiency and effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
LANGUAGE LITERACY Journal of Linguistics Literature and Language Teaching
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v8i2.8766
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HIGH-PROFICIENCY AND LOW-PROFICIENCY LEARNERS’ COMPENSATION STRATEGIES USE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING

Tania Tahmina
LANGUAGE LITERACY Journal of Linguistics Literature and Language Teaching
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

HIGH-PROFICIENCY AND LOW-PROFICIENCY LEARNERS’ COMPENSATION STRATEGIES USE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING

Tania Tahmina
article en

Abstract

Compensation strategies are vital for foreign language learners to overcome difficulties in acquiring a second language. According to Oxford (1990), these strategies help learners “overcome knowledge limitations in all four skills” (p. 90), making them essential for effective language acquisition. This study investigates the preferred compensation strategies of high- and low-proficiency English learners at Jagannath University, Dhaka, Bangladesh, using a mixed-methods approach. Data collection involved the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) questionnaire designed by Oxford, alongside semi-structured interviews to enrich the qualitative findings. Results indicate distinct preferences based on proficiency levels: high-proficiency learners frequently employed Strategy 6: “If I can’t think of an SL word, I use a word or phrase that means the same thing” (40%). Meanwhile, low-proficiency learners favored Strategy 1: “To understand unfamiliar SL words, I make guesses” (66.66%). These findings highlight the significance of adapting teaching approaches to address diverse learner needs, ultimately enhancing language learning efficiency and effectiveness.

LANGUAGE LITERACY Journal of Linguistics Literature and Language TeachingVol. 8(2)
Jagannath University (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

HIGH-PROFICIENCY AND LOW-PROFICIENCY LEARNERS’ COMPENSATION STRATEGIES USE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING — Tania Tahmina · LANGUAGE LITERACY Journal of Linguistics Literature and Language Teaching (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS