A Critique of Oyowe’s Mind-Dependent Ancestral Persistence Thesis
Abstract This article reacts to Oyowe’s understanding of the personal existence of ancestral persons as real mind-dependent entities. The article’s author’s contention is that Oyowe has not managed to rule out the alternative that the author is sympathetic to, namely, that ancestral persons are real mind-independent entities that continue to exist even when, through forgetfulness, they cease to exist in the memory of humans. This article calls Oyowe’s mind-dependent alternative the “safe” one, as it appears easier to defend than the “unsafe,” mind-independent alternative, which the article’s author has yet to develop convincing reasons for.
Authors
- Dennis Masaka (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6775-6046)
Institutions
- Great Zimbabwe University (ZW)
- University of the Free State (ZA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Philosophia Africana
- Published
- 2024-12-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5325/philafri.23.1.0021
- Primary Topic
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00