Perceptual learning of plain-ejective contrast

A recent cross-linguistic study finds that the presence of post-burst silence versus aspiration is a primary cue for ejective-plain stop contrast while VOT plays a minor role (Percival, 2024). This study explores whether English listeners can acquire this release cue after a short exposure and distributional training: “natural correlation” or “inhibition” (Kondaurova and Francis, 2010). Target words were created from Q’anjob’al /tu/ and /t’u/, distinguished by both VOT (short versus high) and release (aspiration versus silence). In the exposure phase, listeners heard stimuli along with pseudo-orthographic forms, <tu> or <t*u>. In the training phase, listeners categorized stimuli and were given feedback: the “natural correlation” group (n = 31) was trained on the same stimuli as the exposure phase; for the “inhibition” group (n = 29), only the release cue distinguished the stops and VOT varied from short to long for both stops. The pre-test and post-test, completed before and after the training phase, show that the release cue, already a primary cue prior to training for most listeners, especially with longer VOT, became stronger after training. No group difference was found. The novel release cue likely makes ejectives poor exemplars of English stops, therefore, easy to distinguish from plain stops (Best et al. 2001).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035256
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptual learning of plain-ejective contrast

Yoonjung Kang, Jack Mahlmann
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Perceptual learning of plain-ejective contrast

Yoonjung Kang, Jack Mahlmann
article en

Abstract

A recent cross-linguistic study finds that the presence of post-burst silence versus aspiration is a primary cue for ejective-plain stop contrast while VOT plays a minor role (Percival, 2024). This study explores whether English listeners can acquire this release cue after a short exposure and distributional training: “natural correlation” or “inhibition” (Kondaurova and Francis, 2010). Target words were created from Q’anjob’al /tu/ and /t’u/, distinguished by both VOT (short versus high) and release (aspiration versus silence). In the exposure phase, listeners heard stimuli along with pseudo-orthographic forms, <tu> or <t*u>. In the training phase, listeners categorized stimuli and were given feedback: the “natural correlation” group (n = 31) was trained on the same stimuli as the exposure phase; for the “inhibition” group (n = 29), only the release cue distinguished the stops and VOT varied from short to long for both stops. The pre-test and post-test, completed before and after the training phase, show that the release cue, already a primary cue prior to training for most listeners, especially with longer VOT, became stronger after training. No group difference was found. The novel release cue likely makes ejectives poor exemplars of English stops, therefore, easy to distinguish from plain stops (Best et al. 2001).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 156(4_Supplement)
University of Toronto (CA), Scarborough Health Network (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.