(Non)assimilation of consonant clusters in phonological conditioning: An acoustic study

In phonological conditioning, phonemes become assimilated to match the properties of adjacent phonemes. At the syllable coda morpheme boundary in the English language, these morphemic elements express grammatical features of marking number (plural) and genitive ( singular and plural possession ) in regular nouns, and the 3rd person singular and past tense in regular verbs. These morphemes create consonant clusters that are expected to assimilate for easy production (or linguistic economy). Unfortunately, it has been revealed that non-native speakers do not always assimilate the consonants to reflect this conditioning. This study investigates the (non)assimilation of consonant clusters in phonological conditioning from an acoustic perspective. It uncovers the patterns of phonological conditioning that are derived from (non)assimilation of consonant clusters in Ghanaian English and the factors that account for such patterns using the Speech Learning Model (SLM) by Flege (1995) and the Markedness Differential Hypothesis by Ekman (1977). Six (6) hours of data recorded from 50 Ghanaians were subjected to auditory and acoustic analyses. Results indicate that Ghanaian speakers of English sometimes assimilate these phonological endings correctly but mostly deviate from inner circle expectations. Typically, while they assimilate the voiceless endings, the voiced endings most often pose a challenge to them. Keywords: assimilation, consonant clusters, phonological conditioning, morphophonemic orthography, markedness

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035247
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(Non)assimilation of consonant clusters in phonological conditioning: An acoustic study

Charlotte Fofo Lomotey, Gifty Osei-Bonsu
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

(Non)assimilation of consonant clusters in phonological conditioning: An acoustic study

Charlotte Fofo Lomotey, Gifty Osei-Bonsu
article en

Abstract

In phonological conditioning, phonemes become assimilated to match the properties of adjacent phonemes. At the syllable coda morpheme boundary in the English language, these morphemic elements express grammatical features of marking number (plural) and genitive ( singular and plural possession ) in regular nouns, and the 3rd person singular and past tense in regular verbs. These morphemes create consonant clusters that are expected to assimilate for easy production (or linguistic economy). Unfortunately, it has been revealed that non-native speakers do not always assimilate the consonants to reflect this conditioning. This study investigates the (non)assimilation of consonant clusters in phonological conditioning from an acoustic perspective. It uncovers the patterns of phonological conditioning that are derived from (non)assimilation of consonant clusters in Ghanaian English and the factors that account for such patterns using the Speech Learning Model (SLM) by Flege (1995) and the Markedness Differential Hypothesis by Ekman (1977). Six (6) hours of data recorded from 50 Ghanaians were subjected to auditory and acoustic analyses. Results indicate that Ghanaian speakers of English sometimes assimilate these phonological endings correctly but mostly deviate from inner circle expectations. Typically, while they assimilate the voiceless endings, the voiced endings most often pose a challenge to them. Keywords: assimilation, consonant clusters, phonological conditioning, morphophonemic orthography, markedness

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 156(4_Supplement)
University of Education, Winneba (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.