Interpreting acoustic measures of imitation in word shadowing

Word shadowing tasks, in which a participant repeats words aloud after a pre-recorded model talker in a laboratory setting, elicit imitation of the model talker’s speech by the shadowing participant, even in the absence of explicit instructions to imitate. However, the nature of this imitation varies substantially within and across shadowers, model talkers, and linguistic features. Recent research has considered this variation in imitation in word shadowing to address how acoustic measures of imitation in these tasks should be interpreted. The results demonstrate (1) imitation of phonetic and phonological structure in vowel shifts and intonation contours, in addition to direct imitation of acoustic formant frequencies and f0; (2) more imitation of non-stereotyped social variants than of stereotyped social variants; and (3) both convergence to overall production patterns and synchrony with token-by-token variability in the speech of the model talker. Together, these results suggest a strong speech perception-production link that operates in real time and is mediated by linguistic and social representations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035336
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpreting acoustic measures of imitation in word shadowing

Cynthia G. Clopper
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

Interpreting acoustic measures of imitation in word shadowing

Cynthia G. Clopper
article en

Abstract

Word shadowing tasks, in which a participant repeats words aloud after a pre-recorded model talker in a laboratory setting, elicit imitation of the model talker’s speech by the shadowing participant, even in the absence of explicit instructions to imitate. However, the nature of this imitation varies substantially within and across shadowers, model talkers, and linguistic features. Recent research has considered this variation in imitation in word shadowing to address how acoustic measures of imitation in these tasks should be interpreted. The results demonstrate (1) imitation of phonetic and phonological structure in vowel shifts and intonation contours, in addition to direct imitation of acoustic formant frequencies and f0; (2) more imitation of non-stereotyped social variants than of stereotyped social variants; and (3) both convergence to overall production patterns and synchrony with token-by-token variability in the speech of the model talker. Together, these results suggest a strong speech perception-production link that operates in real time and is mediated by linguistic and social representations.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 156(4_Supplement)
The Ohio State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.