Interpreting user-generated recordings from the Trump assassination attempt on July 13, 2024

Handheld smartphones are common at public events, and this increases the likelihood that user-generated recordings (UGRs) may capture sounds of interest to audio forensic investigations. The assassination attempt against presidential candidate Donald Trump that took place in Bulter, PA, on Saturday, July 13, 2024, is a prominent example, with a dozen or more official and user-generated videos of the incident. Audio forensic expertise is called upon to determine the physical meaning of the recorded material and to ascertain its authenticity. In the Trump rally shooting incident, multiple concurrent recordings were made from different positions around the scene, capturing the sounds of several audible gunshots. The set of multiple UGR recordings provides information useful to the forensic investigation, such as spatial information about the number, type, position, and orientation of firearms. Examination of the multiple recordings from the Trump rally incident requires interpretation of unsynchronized audio from locations that are not precisely known. Nevertheless, acoustical information obtained from user-generated material at the Trump incident provides essential corroborative information. Examples are presented showing the audio forensic analysis principles applied to the UGR evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035346
Primary Topic
Digital Media Forensic Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpreting user-generated recordings from the Trump assassination attempt on July 13, 2024

Robert C. Maher
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Digital Media Forensic Detection
article

Interpreting user-generated recordings from the Trump assassination attempt on July 13, 2024

Robert C. Maher
article en

Abstract

Handheld smartphones are common at public events, and this increases the likelihood that user-generated recordings (UGRs) may capture sounds of interest to audio forensic investigations. The assassination attempt against presidential candidate Donald Trump that took place in Bulter, PA, on Saturday, July 13, 2024, is a prominent example, with a dozen or more official and user-generated videos of the incident. Audio forensic expertise is called upon to determine the physical meaning of the recorded material and to ascertain its authenticity. In the Trump rally shooting incident, multiple concurrent recordings were made from different positions around the scene, capturing the sounds of several audible gunshots. The set of multiple UGR recordings provides information useful to the forensic investigation, such as spatial information about the number, type, position, and orientation of firearms. Examination of the multiple recordings from the Trump rally incident requires interpretation of unsynchronized audio from locations that are not precisely known. Nevertheless, acoustical information obtained from user-generated material at the Trump incident provides essential corroborative information. Examples are presented showing the audio forensic analysis principles applied to the UGR evidence.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 156(4_Supplement)
Montana State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Digital Media Forensic Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.