Measurement and mitigation for impulse noise from Pickleball Courts

Pickleball is one of the fastest-growing sports in America, and many municipalities have converted tennis courts for pickleball in the past decade. However, the hard plastic ball and hard racquet yields a high-frequency impulsive noise with energy centered near 1200 Hz which is quite different from the low-frequency modal resonance of a tennis racquet. As a result, pickleball noise tends to result in much greater community annoyance than tennis noise from a similar distance since the human ear is more sensitive in that frequency range. However, the relatively short wavelength of pickleball noise also means that it is more easily obstructed by barriers and absorbed by the atmosphere. This study examines some case studies of pickleball noise mitigation and some general principles that are raised in the diffracted versus obstructed path. In addition, the question of the most appropriate metrics for pickleball sound are considered given the brief duration of pickleball hits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0034949
Primary Topic
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurement and mitigation for impulse noise from Pickleball Courts

Braxton Boren
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
article

Measurement and mitigation for impulse noise from Pickleball Courts

Braxton Boren
article en

Abstract

Pickleball is one of the fastest-growing sports in America, and many municipalities have converted tennis courts for pickleball in the past decade. However, the hard plastic ball and hard racquet yields a high-frequency impulsive noise with energy centered near 1200 Hz which is quite different from the low-frequency modal resonance of a tennis racquet. As a result, pickleball noise tends to result in much greater community annoyance than tennis noise from a similar distance since the human ear is more sensitive in that frequency range. However, the relatively short wavelength of pickleball noise also means that it is more easily obstructed by barriers and absorbed by the atmosphere. This study examines some case studies of pickleball noise mitigation and some general principles that are raised in the diffracted versus obstructed path. In addition, the question of the most appropriate metrics for pickleball sound are considered given the brief duration of pickleball hits.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 156(4_Supplement)
American University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Measurement and mitigation for impulse noise from Pickleball Courts — Braxton Boren · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS