Characterizing porous materials using the two-cavity method: Numerical considerations and predictive accuracy

The characteristic impedance and propagation constant are intrinsic parameters for understanding the acoustic absorption performance of a porous material. These parameters can be characterized by testing a bulk absorber in a normal incidence impedance tube via the two-thickness or two-cavity method. The two-thickness method requires two samples backed by a hard wall. The two-cavity method requires only one sample to acquire these intrinsic parameters–a useful feature for characterizing materials expensive or difficult to manufacture. This study uses the two-cavity method to predict the surface impedance and absorption coefficient of various bulk materials. The samples tested include open-cell metallic and non-metallic foam, and additively manufactured diamond-type Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) samples. The predictions derived from the two-cavity method are compared to the predictions derived from the two-thickness method and the measured results. Certain numerical conditions of impedance in the two-cavity calculations, dependent on selected cavity depths, impacted local predictive accuracy. Cavity depth sizing guidelines to avoid these numerical conditions and improve predictive accuracy are provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0034972
Primary Topic
Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing porous materials using the two-cavity method: Numerical considerations and predictive accuracy

Bhisham Sharma, Martha C. Brown, Janith Godakawela, Anthony Vincent Ciletti
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
article

Characterizing porous materials using the two-cavity method: Numerical considerations and predictive accuracy

Bhisham Sharma, Martha C. Brown, Janith Godakawela, Anthony Vincent Ciletti
article en

Abstract

The characteristic impedance and propagation constant are intrinsic parameters for understanding the acoustic absorption performance of a porous material. These parameters can be characterized by testing a bulk absorber in a normal incidence impedance tube via the two-thickness or two-cavity method. The two-thickness method requires two samples backed by a hard wall. The two-cavity method requires only one sample to acquire these intrinsic parameters–a useful feature for characterizing materials expensive or difficult to manufacture. This study uses the two-cavity method to predict the surface impedance and absorption coefficient of various bulk materials. The samples tested include open-cell metallic and non-metallic foam, and additively manufactured diamond-type Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) samples. The predictions derived from the two-cavity method are compared to the predictions derived from the two-thickness method and the measured results. Certain numerical conditions of impedance in the two-cavity calculations, dependent on selected cavity depths, impacted local predictive accuracy. Cavity depth sizing guidelines to avoid these numerical conditions and improve predictive accuracy are provided.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 156(4_Supplement)
Michigan Technological University (US), Langley Research Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Characterizing porous materials using the two-cavity method: Numerical considerations and predictive accuracy — Bhisham Sharma, Martha C. Brown, et al. · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS