The Historical Limitations and Qualitative Transformation of General Education Policy

This study examines the historical limitations of general education policy and proposes strategies for its qualitative transformation. Successive governments have shaped these policies through legislation, institutional reforms, competitive mechanisms, and evaluative management. However, general education has been undermined by legal ambiguity, institutional marginalization, and exclusion from major funding initiatives. Moreover, evaluation-driven approaches have failed to normalize or internalize general education within higher education institutions. To address these challenges, this paper outlines a policy agenda aimed at fostering sustainable and independent development. Key proposals include enacting a “General Education Promotion Act,” establishing a National Liberal Arts College, introducing dedicated financial support programs, and implementing a voluntary accreditation system. These measures seek to realign policies with the unique goals of general education, ensuring its long-term quality and sustainability. This study contributes to the discourse on policy transformation by offering a conceptual framework for rethinking general education policy in higher education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Association of General Education
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2024.18.6.53
Primary Topic
Educational Reforms and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Historical Limitations and Qualitative Transformation of General Education Policy

Seung Su Paek
The Korean Association of General Education
Educational Reforms and Innovations
article

The Historical Limitations and Qualitative Transformation of General Education Policy

Seung Su Paek
article en

Abstract

This study examines the historical limitations of general education policy and proposes strategies for its qualitative transformation. Successive governments have shaped these policies through legislation, institutional reforms, competitive mechanisms, and evaluative management. However, general education has been undermined by legal ambiguity, institutional marginalization, and exclusion from major funding initiatives. Moreover, evaluation-driven approaches have failed to normalize or internalize general education within higher education institutions. To address these challenges, this paper outlines a policy agenda aimed at fostering sustainable and independent development. Key proposals include enacting a “General Education Promotion Act,” establishing a National Liberal Arts College, introducing dedicated financial support programs, and implementing a voluntary accreditation system. These measures seek to realign policies with the unique goals of general education, ensuring its long-term quality and sustainability. This study contributes to the discourse on policy transformation by offering a conceptual framework for rethinking general education policy in higher education.

The Korean Association of General EducationVol. 18(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Educational Reforms and Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Historical Limitations and Qualitative Transformation of General Education Policy — Seung Su Paek · The Korean Association of General Education (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS