WHAT IS HUMAN PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGY (HPT)/PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT (PI)? WHAT IS IT DOING IN OUR SCHOOL?: “WHERE DO WE BELONG?” PERSPECTIVES OFFERED BY ISPI ACADEMIC COMMITTEE MEMBERS

Preamble:The ISPI Academic Committee was formed earlier in the year, in June 2024, following the ISPI conference. Broadly, the ISPI Academic Committee is looking into three areas: (1) Research and Publications; (2) Case Study Competition; and (3) Academic and Corporate Organizational Membership.One of the ongoing conversations within the Performance Improvement (PI) academic committee is the quest to find an ideal home for departments that impart formalized education and training in the field.Within this issue of Performance Improvement Journal are four perspectives offered by Dr. Sue Czeropski, Lead of ISPI’s Academic Committee; Dr. Deri Draper-Amason, Lead for the Case Study Competition Subcommittee; Dr. Holley Handley, Case Study Competition Subcommittee member; and, Dr. Ria Roy, Lead of the Research and Publications Subcommittee.Name: Dr. Sue CzeropskiAffiliation: Capella UniversityDepartment: School of Public Service and EducationPerspective:In the context of higher education, particularly within the School of Education at our institution, I serve as faculty specializing in the facilitation, mentorship, and instruction of courses pertaining to PI. While PI demonstrably transcends organizational structures, I am intrigued by what I perceive as the absence of this field of study within the curricula of a broader range of academic schools at the university level.Our doctoral program features a curriculum in an Applied Improvement Project housed within the School of Education. This placement has piqued my scholarly curiosity, particularly in light of the field’s inherent applicability across various organizational contexts. A review of the University’s academic structure reveals an unanswered question: why is this program situated within the School of Education rather than, for instance, the School of Business? Further investigation into the historical and philosophical underpinnings of this program’s placement would be a valuable contribution to the ongoing discourse surrounding interdisciplinary approaches to PI education.In looking at higher education institutions and PI curricula, examples of PI processes were embedded using a different process name. Song and Tucker (2016) claimed that the healthcare industry is using the model of Transformation Performance Improvement, which highlights six key components of a PI process:PI in the School of Education is a prevalent theme across various research studies. The National Center on Scaling Up Effective Schools focuses on scaling practices to enhance student achievement in Broward County, Florida, and Fort Worth, Texas, utilizing a model based on building prototypes, rapid-cycle testing, and researcher-practitioner partnerships (Garcia & Cerado, 2020). Additionally, a study in the Philippines developed an evaluation tool for the Continuous Improvement (CI) Program in School-Based Management schools, highlighting dimensions such as strategic management, operational management, change adoption, stakeholder analysis, and CI sustainability (Aldana et al., 2022). Another project at the AGH University of Science and Technology in Poland involves students optimizing production and logistic processes through Lean Manufacturing tools, providing practical knowledge and experience in production engineering within the University setting (Kolodziejczak et al., 2019).It has been argued that continuous improvement and PI are related concepts but not interchangeable due to the improvement processes used. The core principles could be shared and highlighted in various contexts. On the other hand, PI, as discussed in the context of continuous performance management, focuses on enhancing individual or organizational performance through various initiatives. While continuous improvement initiatives like 5S in Kaizen, SMED, Lean Six Sigma, and other suggested processes can contribute to PI in applying continuous improvement frameworks like the AIP process model or the ISPI PI (Human Performance Technology [HPT] model) can lead to operational efficiency and waste reduction ultimately impacting overall performance.PI efforts in applied improvement research projects in universities share similarities, such as the level of rigor in evaluating specific interventions or protocols to assess their effectiveness, often requiring adherence to research standards, IRB review, and scientific validity considerations. This is the same regardless of what school the program resides. The alignment between higher education curricula and workforce needs is a crucial aspect of preparing graduates for the dynamic professional landscape. Exploring the effectiveness of current academic programs in equipping students with essential skills is paramount. I would like to see more schools outside of the school of education adopt a performance-improvement curriculum within a university umbrella regardless of the process improvement process used. If you are working in a university and would like to discuss this more or how to go about getting a PI curriculum in your university, please reach out to [email protected]: Dr. Darryl C. Draper-AmasonAffiliation: Old Dominion UniversityDepartment: Office of Enterprise Research and Innovation at Virginia Digital Maritime CenterPerspective:Conceptualizing Performance Improvement (PI), also known as HPT, as an interdisciplinary field that integrates knowledge from psychology, organizational development, instructional design, and other domains to enhance human performance in individuals, groups, and organizations. Having worked in the corporate, government, and higher education sectors, it became apparent that a narrow view of PI will yield limited solutions to PI problems.My doctoral program in Instructional Systems at Pennsylvania State University was situated with other complementary disciplines such as workforce development, adult education, and curriculum and instruction. Over the past decade, the Instructional Systems department transitioned into Learning and Performance Systems with distinct areas of focus: adult and lifelong learning, corporate training, distance and online education, instructional design, organizational development, learning sciences, workforce development, and workplace learning. Penn State University’s shift from Instructional Systems to Learning and Performance Systems kept the systems thinking approach while strengthening the HPT program.This shift is indicative of a national shift within university programs. For example, focused on innovation and continuous improvement, Indiana University’s Instructional Systems Technology program was restructured to include PI. In an article by Cho, et al. (2017), the authors stated that “we improve human learning and performance in diverse contexts” (p. 34). Indiana University’s program focuses on K-12, higher education, business, government, military, and non-profit sectors. Indiana University has a long, illustrious pedigree for producing scholars in the instructional design field. Indiana University’s history includes “making efforts toward pushing and collapsing the boundaries of the field through theoretical diversity, which has fostered innovation and continued transformation in our program” (Haynes & Cho, 2013, p. 28).Florida State University’s Instructional Systems and Learning Technologies program “focuses on instructional design, emerging technologies, and performance improvement” (Klein & Dennen, 2017, p. 38). The authors stated that “students attain skills in the design of instruction, performance system analysis, project management and change management across business, higher education and the military” (p. 38).Florida State University’s purposeful inclusion of courses such as project management, business management, legal, and ethics is admirable. However, it is unclear if there are direct links to the business school curriculum and faculty. Are the instructors in these programs business faculty or education faculty? Do faculty have direct experience in the corporate, government, or military sectors? Is experiential learning something to value and incorporate into the respective curriculum? At this point, the answers seem unclear.Incorporating business and instructional technology design curriculums enhances the ability to create effective and robust learning environments. Instructional designers can benefit from the business school curriculum, HPT’s systematic approach to identifying learning and performance gaps, and designing educational and impactful organizational interventions. The dual focus on instructional design and business acumen ensures educational interventions are pedagogically sound and aligned with organizational goals and performance metrics.Integrating education and business disciplines within HPT creates a synergistic effect that enhances the overall effectiveness of PI initiatives. Dessinger, et al. (2012) argue that “the interdisciplinary approach of HPT leverages the analytical rigor of business disciplines and the pedagogical expertise of education to create interventions that are both effective and sustainable” (p. 33). By combining the strengths of both fields, HPT practitioners can develop comprehensive solutions that address the multifaceted nature of performance issues.One key benefit of this interdisciplinary integration is the ability to address performance issues at the individual, group, and organizational levels. Educational principles ensure that individuals receive the training and support they need to improve their skills, while business principles ensure that these improvements align with the organization's strategic goals. PI can be utilized in other ways than human performance. Van Tiem and Burns (2020) described a Chinese case study in which ISPI’s 10 Performance Improvement Standards were employed to develop a marketing management PI strategy. This interesting notion suggests further uses of PI standards to expand the reach of the tool.Another synergistic benefit of the alignment of the business school and education’s instructional systems curriculum is that it provides a holistic approach to problem-solving. Students engaged in coursework from both disciplines develop a comprehensive skill set that combines business acumen with educational expertise, fostering innovative solutions to organizational performance challenges (Kaufman, 2006). According to Rothwell (2020), another benefit of coupling the business school and instructional systems curriculum is that the graduate is equipped with knowledge in PI, business concepts, and instructional design. These skills appeal to employers from corporate, government, and higher education institutions. Lastly, interdisciplinary cross-pollination can drive research and development that advances HPT. This can lead to new methodologies, evaluation tools, and technology that benefit both the business and education sectors.The interdisciplinary integration of education and business disciplines within HPT offers significant benefits for organizations seeking to improve performance. Educational principles provide a foundation for effective learning and development, while business disciplines offer tools and frameworks for optimizing organizational processes. However, further research is warranted to fully understand the PI program curriculum of universities. Reviewing university program course offerings, experiential learning opportunities, and curriculum and faculty sharing between business and education programs would reveal answers to the questions.Darryl (Deri) Draper-Amason has been involved with PI across corporate, government, military, and higher education sectors. Currently, Deri is a research assistant professor at Old Dominion University’s Virginia Digital Maritime Center. Deri can be reached at [email protected]: Dr. Holley HandleyAffiliation: University of West FloridaDepartment: Instructional Design and TechnologyPerspective:The University of West Florida’s (UWF) Instructional Design and Technology (IDT) program is housed in the School of Education. The IDT department provides undergraduate and graduate degree programs in Instructional Design and Performance Technology (IDPT). The Bachelor of Science in IDT, Master of Education in IDPT, and Doctor of Education in Instructional and Performance Technology (IPT) are among the degrees offered. Graduates from these programs are equipped to identify organizational performance deficiencies, devise solutions, and implement and evaluate those solutions. The programs prepare graduates for various roles in various sectors, including healthcare, government, U.S. military, business, corporate positions, K-12 and higher education, and other organizations that aim to improve performance and integrate technology in the workplace.Currently, the IDT department is part of the School of Education. The IDT students are from many different workforce disciplines and are not limited to K-20. The students who enter our programs subsequently work in varied settings. One of the challenges faced at UWF is determining the appropriate location for the IDT department. The School of Education might not be a suitable fit for IDT, given that the primary stakeholders in the School of Education are focused on the K-20 sector.This history of the IDT program and department provides context as to the current location of the department and the degree program. Degrees in IDT were first introduced as specializations under master’s level programs in the Applied Science, Technology, and Administration (ASTA) Department, housed in the College of Professional Studies (N. Hastings, personal communication, June 27, 2024). The ASTA department originally had only one degree program, the Educational Technology (ET), and included three specializations: Manufacturing, Building Construction, and Electrical. As ASTA expanded, the Engineering Technology and Management Systems (ETMS) program was added to the department. It initially included specializations in Education Leadership and Instructional Technology but later expanded to include an additional specialization in HPT. The MEd in Instructional Technology program and the Instructional Technology specialization within the EdD program were later added as part of the expansion of the ETMS program. While ASTA housed a wide variety of specializations within the programs, the over-arching mission of the department remained the same: to equip students with the necessary skills to enter the workforce with increased levels of responsibility. The curriculum focused on interdisciplinary education and practical, industry-relevant training.The IDT department became a standalone entity in 2012 as the university underwent reorganization and program additions. The restructuring placed the department within the College of Professional Studies, which later transitioned into the College of Education and Professional Studies (CEPS), adding a heightened focus on educational degrees. The IDT department remained within CEPS until the recent reorganization in 2023 when the university disbanded CEPS and established the School of Education. The new school encompasses K-20 educational programs and the IDT department. The administration and faculty are currently considering where the IDT department and its various programs and certificates should be situated. Even though the program has undergone significant changes, its location within the university has remained static. The IDT department, comprising various stakeholder groups, has been situated within the School of Education, concentrating on K-20 educational initiatives. One of the concerns associated with being in the School of Education is the visibility of the department’s offerings to potential students from disciplines beyond K-20, which includes the corporate sector. The question remains: Will individuals from fields outside of K-20 find our programs and degrees?Another consideration in determining the location of the IDT department is that we have added the Doctor of Education (EDD) in IPT. The program was approved by the Florida BOE in 2019, and the first cohort of students enrolled in 2020. The EdD program in IPT emerged from the well-established specialization in IDT within an EdD in Curriculum and Instruction (C&I) program. The C&I program adhered to the conventional PhD format, emphasizing scholarly research and requiring students to conduct empirical research and present their findings in a traditional five-chapter dissertation. However, over time, it became evident that this structure was not meeting the needs of the students pursuing the IDT specialization.The first challenge was that many of these students were employed in non-traditional educational (or corporate) settings, where a C&I degree was not highly valued. This challenge is also the primary consideration when deciding which college should oversee the IDT department. The second challenge was that the program's coursework was heavily focused on the C&I component, allotting only 18 credit hours for academic preparation related to the specialization. This was equivalent to roughly half of a Master’s which was for the level of education we was necessary for doctoral Lastly, our students to working in their respective fields we it was essential to from the traditional of comprehensive and we to provide students with to in the of research they would be to conduct in their organizations address the the university and in the Project for the Education in and developed a standalone EdD in which the approved of in June 2019, and enrolled its first cohort of students in 2020. This new program was based on the principles and which are focused on the educational to a more professional doctoral preparing students to serve as organizational performance and change in their areas of expertise institutions offer EdD degrees focused on Educational Education Curriculum and Instruction 2022). The UWF EdD is it to a degree in which is a field for in that has an in and designing and instruction for training and development of West Florida, 2022). to the nature of our our program challenges that beyond those faced by institutions and other EdD programs that serve students working in the K-20 the ISPI HPT model Tiem et al., as the that would students to the PI align the program within that and design the research of the curriculum to align with the and associated with the PI & Hastings, ongoing question of where the IDT department should be situated has to be for IDT include the College of Engineering and the College of However, one of the concerns with the is that we have the EdD program, which is not included in degrees offered by the The EdD for our program as it students to from a to an and to the Additionally, the College of is also a to as the to Schools of and what the would be of adding another department and program to the It has been that the department could be added to the College of being to the considering the College of it is appropriate to the of our field and IDT includes technology performance and innovation in education The IDT program focuses on solutions for educational which involves a of various technologies, and to engineering instructional design often with and systems engineering to create and implement effective learning the IDT program in the College of Engineering could these interdisciplinary IDT program has a history of to the needs of its students and the broader educational landscape. part of the ASTA within the College of Professional Studies, the IDT program has undergone to its current placement in the School of Education. However, this location has about the program's alignment with the K-20 development of the Doctor of Education in IPT program, to to working in diverse organizational settings, the nature of the IDT department. The challenges in this program with traditional departments the need for a more suitable home to support the program’s and interdisciplinary its on technology performance and educational the IDT program could within the College of This would interdisciplinary align the program with its and serve the diverse of its while the College of it also offers opportunities, particularly for students to into roles within corporate UWF to the fit for the IDT department, it is crucial to the program’s historical context and that the IDT department is situated within a college that its interdisciplinary nature and diverse stakeholder needs will be key to its continued and preparing graduates who can address performance and technology challenges across various is currently an at UWF and can be reached at Dr. Ria State UniversityDepartment: Organizational Performance and I offer my on where I the PI should be housed within higher education, it is to to the about the of our field. The field of HPT also known as PI at its core is a of an The and of the field of PI, which it when to other of is its nature and this within our that suggests a of PI be an in to and a working knowledge of to these this field and of our is to improve organizational performance. It could be across levels within an while practitioners a and we to work across within an within higher education, academic programs are often housed within the college of education and within departments that offer instructional technology instructional systems technology or educational technology housed in another college that has to why a department a field such as should be housed within their graduate it is often with such as is and are they of the earlier work by to education and training to create instruction in an to at the individual & p. However, in outside of the school there are a of other than instruction that One can that the of the field is the programs are housed within schools of education and within departments that offer this and of programs offers a among other stakeholders within the department within the graduate The of formalized and an and at an of the field due to its inherent only to the about the and within academic is one of the many areas that PI practitioners PI practitioners from a in It is to that an instructional is not to an HPT If one has an educational training and professional in one is a in instructional design. it is to other specialization be it business process or one is a in a their performance is by their of that specific of it to workplace performance but it not a an will on a specific or a of knowledge across their PI it is one of the why practitioners are to be across given my and view of the programs are within schools of and concerns will be to those who share a focus and challenge as is to our within business schools our value has worked with performance is currently a and can be reached at