Addressing the Negative Externalities of Trade: Flanking Policies and the Role of Package Treaties

Abstract This article examines the rationales for addressing sustainability and social inclusion in trade policy and the tradeoffs among imperfect institutional choices in doing so through ‘flanking policies’. It examines three types of negative spillovers or externalities implicated by trade: material, moral, and social/political. Section 1 defines terms and sets forth the argument. Section 2 typologizes the three categories of negative externalities and then highlights the challenges posed for flanking measures given the reciprocal nature of externalities. It respectively addresses environmental harms and labor and social inclusion concerns. Section 3 assesses different institutional alternatives for addressing negative externalities, dividing them between domestic measures targeted at protecting domestic concerns and international ones, such as package treaties. Section 4 shows how the concept of a flanking measure can be flipped, so that environmental sustainability and social inclusion become the core and trade measures become the flanking policies. Section 5 concludes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Trade Review
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474745624000363
Citations
4
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing the Negative Externalities of Trade: Flanking Policies and the Role of Package Treaties

Gregory Shaffer
4 citations
World Trade Review
World Trade Organization Law
8.92
article

Addressing the Negative Externalities of Trade: Flanking Policies and the Role of Package Treaties

Gregory Shaffer
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the rationales for addressing sustainability and social inclusion in trade policy and the tradeoffs among imperfect institutional choices in doing so through ‘flanking policies’. It examines three types of negative spillovers or externalities implicated by trade: material, moral, and social/political. Section 1 defines terms and sets forth the argument. Section 2 typologizes the three categories of negative externalities and then highlights the challenges posed for flanking measures given the reciprocal nature of externalities. It respectively addresses environmental harms and labor and social inclusion concerns. Section 3 assesses different institutional alternatives for addressing negative externalities, dividing them between domestic measures targeted at protecting domestic concerns and international ones, such as package treaties. Section 4 shows how the concept of a flanking measure can be flipped, so that environmental sustainability and social inclusion become the core and trade measures become the flanking policies. Section 5 concludes.

World Trade ReviewVol. 23(5)
Georgetown University (US), Center for International Environmental Law (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
World Trade Organization Law
8.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Addressing the Negative Externalities of Trade: Flanking Policies and the Role of Package Treaties — Gregory Shaffer · World Trade Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS