Digitising “The Big Lie”: Algorithmic Curation as an Inhibitor of Media Exposure Diversity Online

While multiple scholarly disciplines have scrutinised algorithms and their social power, this article examines algorithmic recommender systems in terms of their potential to reduce exposure diversity online.The paper positions the debate on algorithmic content curation within the theoretical framework of media diversity studies, emphasising the normative ideal of media diversity as a social good, and examining the impact of algorithmic behaviour on personal autonomy, specifically focusing on exposure diversity in online environments.The discussion then introduces a complementary concept to Pariser's (2011) notion of the "filter bubble," namely the shrinkage funnel, and discusses this concept in terms of online exposure diversity, personal choice sovereignty, and its potential to initiate the illusory truth effect.The paper reviews selected examples of content restrictive algorithmic behaviour to demonstrate how shrinkage funnels can undermine personal autonomy and prompt detrimental societal or political outcomes.By distinguishing between filter bubbles and shrinkage funnels, this study provides a foundation for future empirical investigations and potential policy interventions aimed at promoting exposure diversity in algorithmically curated online environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communicatio
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2024.2424841
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digitising “The Big Lie”: Algorithmic Curation as an Inhibitor of Media Exposure Diversity Online

Julie Reid
5 citations
Communicatio
Social Media and Politics
4.79
article

Digitising “The Big Lie”: Algorithmic Curation as an Inhibitor of Media Exposure Diversity Online

Julie Reid
article en
5 citations

Abstract

While multiple scholarly disciplines have scrutinised algorithms and their social power, this article examines algorithmic recommender systems in terms of their potential to reduce exposure diversity online.The paper positions the debate on algorithmic content curation within the theoretical framework of media diversity studies, emphasising the normative ideal of media diversity as a social good, and examining the impact of algorithmic behaviour on personal autonomy, specifically focusing on exposure diversity in online environments.The discussion then introduces a complementary concept to Pariser's (2011) notion of the "filter bubble," namely the shrinkage funnel, and discusses this concept in terms of online exposure diversity, personal choice sovereignty, and its potential to initiate the illusory truth effect.The paper reviews selected examples of content restrictive algorithmic behaviour to demonstrate how shrinkage funnels can undermine personal autonomy and prompt detrimental societal or political outcomes.By distinguishing between filter bubbles and shrinkage funnels, this study provides a foundation for future empirical investigations and potential policy interventions aimed at promoting exposure diversity in algorithmically curated online environments.

CommunicatioVol. 50(4)
University of South Africa (ZA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Media and Politics
4.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.