ESG Reporting: Assessing Compliance of Polish Public Companies with EU Taxonomy Guidelines

The paper aims to evaluate how well Polish public companies' activities align with the European Union Taxonomy guidelines (EU Taxonomy). The research involved a review of literature on ESG and non-financial reporting, identification of key guidelines for mandatory disclosures, and analysis of reports from companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange’s three main indices. This approach allowed for determining the shares of activities that meet the EU Taxonomy's compliance and eligibility criteria, focusing on turnover, capital expenditures (CapEx), and operating expenditures (OpEx). The research shows a relatively low percentage of activities compliant with the EU Taxonomy among the studied companies. There are significant sectoral differences in the level of compliance of companies activity with the EU Taxonomy, with compliance level highest in industries with substantial environmental impacts (like industrial production and construction) and lowest in sectors with limited environmental effects (such as finance and healthcare). A key limitation is the analysis's scope, which covers only one year's reports due to the non-financial reporting standards' implementation schedule. Continuous monitoring of this issue is necessary. The ESG activities of companies are crucial from the perspective of building competitive advantage, influencing customer awareness, meeting consumer expectations or finally meeting non-financial reporting requirements, but involve complex processes, including operationalization, implementation, monitoring, and auditing of ESG practices. Non-financial reporting entails significant direct and indirect costs. Non-financial reporting enhances the transparency of companies' operations and is likely to influence company ratings for investment purposes. However, the costs associated with reporting could lead to higher prices and potentially burden consumers. The article addresses a current, practical problem faced by companies required to conduct non-financial reporting. It is relevant for various stakeholders, including consumers, shareholders, business partners, and financiers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58691/man/196152
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ESG Reporting: Assessing Compliance of Polish Public Companies with EU Taxonomy Guidelines

Maciej Koszel
2 citations
Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
4.45
article

ESG Reporting: Assessing Compliance of Polish Public Companies with EU Taxonomy Guidelines

Maciej Koszel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The paper aims to evaluate how well Polish public companies' activities align with the European Union Taxonomy guidelines (EU Taxonomy). The research involved a review of literature on ESG and non-financial reporting, identification of key guidelines for mandatory disclosures, and analysis of reports from companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange’s three main indices. This approach allowed for determining the shares of activities that meet the EU Taxonomy's compliance and eligibility criteria, focusing on turnover, capital expenditures (CapEx), and operating expenditures (OpEx). The research shows a relatively low percentage of activities compliant with the EU Taxonomy among the studied companies. There are significant sectoral differences in the level of compliance of companies activity with the EU Taxonomy, with compliance level highest in industries with substantial environmental impacts (like industrial production and construction) and lowest in sectors with limited environmental effects (such as finance and healthcare). A key limitation is the analysis's scope, which covers only one year's reports due to the non-financial reporting standards' implementation schedule. Continuous monitoring of this issue is necessary. The ESG activities of companies are crucial from the perspective of building competitive advantage, influencing customer awareness, meeting consumer expectations or finally meeting non-financial reporting requirements, but involve complex processes, including operationalization, implementation, monitoring, and auditing of ESG practices. Non-financial reporting entails significant direct and indirect costs. Non-financial reporting enhances the transparency of companies' operations and is likely to influence company ratings for investment purposes. However, the costs associated with reporting could lead to higher prices and potentially burden consumers. The article addresses a current, practical problem faced by companies required to conduct non-financial reporting. It is relevant for various stakeholders, including consumers, shareholders, business partners, and financiers.

ManagementVol. 28(2)
Poznań University of Economics and Business (PL), Japan Real Estate Institute (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.