A Legal-Dogmatic View on Freedom of Expression in Social Networks

The freedom of the press and the right to free speech also apply in the digital sphere. Every citizen with Internet access has the ability to easily share and receive information and opinions with a global audience. The hope is that unfiltered free expression and diversity of opinion will lead to more democratic and pluralistic societies. This utopia, however, fails due to humans’ limited information processing capacity. No one is able to take note of all or even a fraction of the opinions and information presented on the Internet, process them and use them as a basis for their own opinions and actions. As a result, the Internet has been “platformized”. Platforms bring together various user groups and frequently create a closed ecosystem of various services and information for them. The purpose of this paper is to provide answers on questions, among other, what lies behind social networks function as information intermediaries and what rights social media users have against the deletion of their posts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2024.33.4.117-129
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Legal-Dogmatic View on Freedom of Expression in Social Networks

Marian Horváth, Rastislav Funta
3 citations
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
3.40
article

A Legal-Dogmatic View on Freedom of Expression in Social Networks

Marian Horváth, Rastislav Funta
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The freedom of the press and the right to free speech also apply in the digital sphere. Every citizen with Internet access has the ability to easily share and receive information and opinions with a global audience. The hope is that unfiltered free expression and diversity of opinion will lead to more democratic and pluralistic societies. This utopia, however, fails due to humans’ limited information processing capacity. No one is able to take note of all or even a fraction of the opinions and information presented on the Internet, process them and use them as a basis for their own opinions and actions. As a result, the Internet has been “platformized”. Platforms bring together various user groups and frequently create a closed ecosystem of various services and information for them. The purpose of this paper is to provide answers on questions, among other, what lies behind social networks function as information intermediaries and what rights social media users have against the deletion of their posts.

Studia Iuridica LublinensiaVol. 33(4)
Danubius University (SK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.