Catalog for IT Project Management Auditing

This paper presents an objective method for evaluating the project management of IT projects. To achieve this, a quantitative survey was utilized to create and validate a questionnaire consisting of 19 domains and 46 test criteria. The study focuses on traditional project management techniques and incorporates relevant content from PRINCE2, PMBOK 7<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">th</sup>, and ICB4 project management standards. According to statistical analysis, the survey results suggest that the questionnaire is suitable for conducting an independent assessment of project management.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cinti63048.2024.10830858
Primary Topic
Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Catalog for IT Project Management Auditing

Philipp Rosenberger, Christoph Gritsch, Michael Haschberger
Information Technology Governance and Strategy
article

Catalog for IT Project Management Auditing

Philipp Rosenberger, Christoph Gritsch, Michael Haschberger
article en

Abstract

This paper presents an objective method for evaluating the project management of IT projects. To achieve this, a quantitative survey was utilized to create and validate a questionnaire consisting of 19 domains and 46 test criteria. The study focuses on traditional project management techniques and incorporates relevant content from PRINCE2, PMBOK 7<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">th</sup>, and ICB4 project management standards. According to statistical analysis, the survey results suggest that the questionnaire is suitable for conducting an independent assessment of project management.

Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Information Technology Governance and Strategy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.