A Weighted Consensus Measure for Group Decision-Making with Dichotomous Inputs

In this study, we present a weighted consensus measure which enables measuring the level of consensus in a group of decision makers when their votes regarding an initiative are taken into account with various weight values. Here, we assume that the votes are either ‘yes’ or ‘no’. We argue that the weighted case is closer to the real-life group decision-making situations and adapt seven reasonable requirements for a consensus measure to the case of weighted dichotomous inputs. Then we present a fuzzy entropy-based weighted consensus measure and prove that it satisfies the above-mentioned requirements. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the favourable properties of the proposed weighted consensus measure.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cinti63048.2024.10830796
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Weighted Consensus Measure for Group Decision-Making with Dichotomous Inputs

Tamás Jónás, Jenő Fáró
1 citations
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
0.49
article

A Weighted Consensus Measure for Group Decision-Making with Dichotomous Inputs

Tamás Jónás, Jenő Fáró
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this study, we present a weighted consensus measure which enables measuring the level of consensus in a group of decision makers when their votes regarding an initiative are taken into account with various weight values. Here, we assume that the votes are either ‘yes’ or ‘no’. We argue that the weighted case is closer to the real-life group decision-making situations and adapt seven reasonable requirements for a consensus measure to the case of weighted dichotomous inputs. Then we present a fuzzy entropy-based weighted consensus measure and prove that it satisfies the above-mentioned requirements. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the favourable properties of the proposed weighted consensus measure.

Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.