Assessing AI-Powered Translation Quality: Insights from the Translation of the Farewell Sermon

Artificial Intelligence (AI) powered translation influxes in the translation industry. Yet, questions have arisen about the quality of AI-powered translation systems (AIPTSs). Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the translation quality gendered by ChatGPT to the Farewell Sermon. Using House's (2015) model of translation quality assessment (TQA), the study analyzed the Farwell Sermon focusing on text, register analysis of field, tenor mode and genre. The language/text analysis revealed that AIPTSs produced lexical and syntactic inaccuracies that hindered capturing the sermon's intended religious voice. In register, Field, the analysis pointed out that the AIPTSs captured the broad themes of the Farewell Sermon, but often missed subtleties in religious terminology. AIPTSs also adopted superficial literal translation of the sentence structures. In Tenor, the analysis revealed that the Prophet's role as a moral and spiritual guide was somewhat diluted in the translation. Likewise, AIPTSs struggled to maintain the Prophet's authoritative and compassionate stance. The AIPTSs maintained general coherence but faced challenges with cohesive devices such as conjunctions, pronouns, and references. Furthermore, the microanalysis revealed an amount of 81 overt translation errors that the AIPTSs committed while translating the Farwell Sermon into English, the most frequent were "creative translation" with 24 errors, "not translated" with 15 errors, "distortion of meaning" with 9 errors, "slight change in meaning" with 8 errors and "breach of the SL system" with 7 errors. "Significant change in meaning" and "cultural filtering" were less noticeable with 6 and 4 errors, respectively. Additionally, the analysis revealed that House's (2015) model is to some extent suitable for assessing the quality of AIPTSs, one type of error was technical and beyond the model focus though. The researchers called it "software intervention". Software interventions can either positively or negatively affect the translation depending on whether the error improves readability without distorting meaning or inaccuracies. The study recommends the importance of tuning the AIPTSs applications to prevent the inducing of technical systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Language Education
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v8i4.70034
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing AI-Powered Translation Quality: Insights from the Translation of the Farewell Sermon

Wagdi Rashad Ali Bin-Hady, Eisa Asiri, Amal Abdelsattar Metwally
3 citations
International Journal of Language Education
Translation Studies and Practices
31.27
article

Assessing AI-Powered Translation Quality: Insights from the Translation of the Farewell Sermon

Wagdi Rashad Ali Bin-Hady, Eisa Asiri, Amal Abdelsattar Metwally
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) powered translation influxes in the translation industry. Yet, questions have arisen about the quality of AI-powered translation systems (AIPTSs). Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the translation quality gendered by ChatGPT to the Farewell Sermon. Using House's (2015) model of translation quality assessment (TQA), the study analyzed the Farwell Sermon focusing on text, register analysis of field, tenor mode and genre. The language/text analysis revealed that AIPTSs produced lexical and syntactic inaccuracies that hindered capturing the sermon's intended religious voice. In register, Field, the analysis pointed out that the AIPTSs captured the broad themes of the Farewell Sermon, but often missed subtleties in religious terminology. AIPTSs also adopted superficial literal translation of the sentence structures. In Tenor, the analysis revealed that the Prophet's role as a moral and spiritual guide was somewhat diluted in the translation. Likewise, AIPTSs struggled to maintain the Prophet's authoritative and compassionate stance. The AIPTSs maintained general coherence but faced challenges with cohesive devices such as conjunctions, pronouns, and references. Furthermore, the microanalysis revealed an amount of 81 overt translation errors that the AIPTSs committed while translating the Farwell Sermon into English, the most frequent were "creative translation" with 24 errors, "not translated" with 15 errors, "distortion of meaning" with 9 errors, "slight change in meaning" with 8 errors and "breach of the SL system" with 7 errors. "Significant change in meaning" and "cultural filtering" were less noticeable with 6 and 4 errors, respectively. Additionally, the analysis revealed that House's (2015) model is to some extent suitable for assessing the quality of AIPTSs, one type of error was technical and beyond the model focus though. The researchers called it "software intervention". Software interventions can either positively or negatively affect the translation depending on whether the error improves readability without distorting meaning or inaccuracies. The study recommends the importance of tuning the AIPTSs applications to prevent the inducing of technical systems.

International Journal of Language EducationVol. 8(4)
Hadhramout University (YE), King Khalid University (SA)
King Khalid University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Translation Studies and Practices
31.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.