Applying Design Thinking to Research Political Science’s “Wicked Problems”: A Pragmatic and Abductive Approach

Design thinking has gained prominence as an innovative, human-centered methodology for addressing complex problems across disciplines. Despite its widespread application in fields such as business and education, its potential as a research tool in political science remains underexplored. This paper presents design thinking method as a robust qualitative research methodology suitable for examining comparative social and public policy, governance, and political systems, especially contested and value-laden social problems. By aligning the iterative, abductive processes of design thinking with the principles of pragmatism, this framework offers a novel approach to addressing the multifaceted empirical challenges in areas such as health policy, environmental governance, political campaigns, and evidence-based policymaking. Through a six-phase standardized framework and actionable templates, this manuscript demonstrates how design thinking enables researchers to generate insights that bridge theory and practice in political science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal of Political Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2025.151010
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying Design Thinking to Research Political Science’s “Wicked Problems”: A Pragmatic and Abductive Approach

Jacqueline Fendt
1 citations
Open Journal of Political Science
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
2.11
article

Applying Design Thinking to Research Political Science’s “Wicked Problems”: A Pragmatic and Abductive Approach

Jacqueline Fendt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Design thinking has gained prominence as an innovative, human-centered methodology for addressing complex problems across disciplines. Despite its widespread application in fields such as business and education, its potential as a research tool in political science remains underexplored. This paper presents design thinking method as a robust qualitative research methodology suitable for examining comparative social and public policy, governance, and political systems, especially contested and value-laden social problems. By aligning the iterative, abductive processes of design thinking with the principles of pragmatism, this framework offers a novel approach to addressing the multifaceted empirical challenges in areas such as health policy, environmental governance, political campaigns, and evidence-based policymaking. Through a six-phase standardized framework and actionable templates, this manuscript demonstrates how design thinking enables researchers to generate insights that bridge theory and practice in political science.

Open Journal of Political ScienceVol. 15(01)
ESCP Business School (FR), ESCP Business School (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Applying Design Thinking to Research Political Science’s “Wicked Problems”: A Pragmatic and Abductive Approach — Jacqueline Fendt · Open Journal of Political Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS