Replication & re-examination of empirical research in corporate reporting and accounting

Replication in empirical research validates findings, identifies contextual boundaries, and promotes transparency in research. Replication studies are pivotal for assessing the durability and generalizability of research, creating a more reliable foundation for future scholarly work. This is even more true in social sciences, where observed phenomena may be affected by the institutional and social settings as well as by changes in people’s beliefs over time. In this respect, replication and re-examination of prior studies should be an integral part of a social scientist’s toolkit. In the accounting field, researchers should always feel a responsibility to validate new findings in different settings/periods, since empirical results can influence corporate decisions, stakeholders’ behaviour, and regulatory standards without any precise limits of time and space. This special issue of Financial Reporting – Journal of Financial Communication seeks to address the ongoing challenges and evolving perspectives in the replication and re-examination of prior studies in accounting research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
FINANCIAL REPORTING
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/fr2024-002001
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Replication & re-examination of empirical research in corporate reporting and accounting

Marco Maria Mattei, Massimo Bonacchi
1 links
FINANCIAL REPORTING
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Replication & re-examination of empirical research in corporate reporting and accounting

Marco Maria Mattei, Massimo Bonacchi
article en

Abstract

Replication in empirical research validates findings, identifies contextual boundaries, and promotes transparency in research. Replication studies are pivotal for assessing the durability and generalizability of research, creating a more reliable foundation for future scholarly work. This is even more true in social sciences, where observed phenomena may be affected by the institutional and social settings as well as by changes in people’s beliefs over time. In this respect, replication and re-examination of prior studies should be an integral part of a social scientist’s toolkit. In the accounting field, researchers should always feel a responsibility to validate new findings in different settings/periods, since empirical results can influence corporate decisions, stakeholders’ behaviour, and regulatory standards without any precise limits of time and space. This special issue of Financial Reporting – Journal of Financial Communication seeks to address the ongoing challenges and evolving perspectives in the replication and re-examination of prior studies in accounting research.

FINANCIAL REPORTING(2)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.