Towards a Safe Church: More Than a Lambeth Call

Abstract This paper gives definitions of terms which have become critical in ensuring that Anglican churches minimize the risk of harm to all who are involved as practitioners or recipients of its ministries. This imperative is rooted in Scripture, not just the recent history or pronouncements of the Lambeth Conference 2022. The terms ‘Safeguarding’, ‘Safe Ministry’ and ‘Safe Church’ (SC) are set out with reference to the ‘Lambeth Calls’. This paper explores why such terms have come to the forefront of current theological praxis, notes historical iterations of such matters and asks why some Anglican churches or provinces may resist adopting this Lambeth Call. It offers both an apologetic for the universal adoption of SC practices and a scriptural and dominical mandate for them. The paper identifies theological and scriptural principles on which SC theory and practice might be grounded. Anglican churches and provinces are encouraged to develop a theory and practice of SC pertinent to their environment rather than adhere to abstract universal prescriptions which risk irrelevance amidst cultural and contextual particularity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Anglican Studies
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1740355324000378
Primary Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a Safe Church: More Than a Lambeth Call

A. G. Banks, Fergus J. King, Alfred SEBAHENE, Nant Hnin Hnin Aye et al.
Journal of Anglican Studies
American Constitutional Law and Politics
article

Towards a Safe Church: More Than a Lambeth Call

A. G. Banks, Fergus J. King, Alfred SEBAHENE, Nant Hnin Hnin Aye, Maimbo W.F. Mndolwa, Albert Chama
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper gives definitions of terms which have become critical in ensuring that Anglican churches minimize the risk of harm to all who are involved as practitioners or recipients of its ministries. This imperative is rooted in Scripture, not just the recent history or pronouncements of the Lambeth Conference 2022. The terms ‘Safeguarding’, ‘Safe Ministry’ and ‘Safe Church’ (SC) are set out with reference to the ‘Lambeth Calls’. This paper explores why such terms have come to the forefront of current theological praxis, notes historical iterations of such matters and asks why some Anglican churches or provinces may resist adopting this Lambeth Call. It offers both an apologetic for the universal adoption of SC practices and a scriptural and dominical mandate for them. The paper identifies theological and scriptural principles on which SC theory and practice might be grounded. Anglican churches and provinces are encouraged to develop a theory and practice of SC pertinent to their environment rather than adhere to abstract universal prescriptions which risk irrelevance amidst cultural and contextual particularity.

Journal of Anglican StudiesVol. 22(2)
University of Lusaka (ZM), Stellenbosch University (ZA), University of Divinity (AU), St. John's University of Tanzania (TZ), Eckernforde Tanga University (TZ), National HIV/AIDS/STI/TB Council (ZM), Holy Cross College (US), Holy Cross College (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
American Constitutional Law and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards a Safe Church: More Than a Lambeth Call — A. G. Banks, Fergus J. King, et al. · Journal of Anglican Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS