Types of Anxiety about Social Hazards: Focusing on Unusual and Everyday hazards

This study aims to classify anxiety attitudes toward social hazards using latent class analysis. By applying two dimensions of Solvic's (1987) psychometric study, dread and knowledge, social hazards were divided into unusual hazards (war, natural disasters, new diseases) and everyday hazards (fire, traffic accidents, food hygiene). Here, individuals can be classified into types of anxiety or no anxiety about all risks among the two types of social hazards, or types of anxiety about only one type of social hazard (anxiety, non-anxiety, unusual risk anxiety, everyday risk anxiety). Furthermore, a hypothesis was set up on how individual characteristics affect the process of being classified into four types of social anxiety. For verification, the ‘2022 Social Survey’ data from Statistics Korea was used, and 28,096 adults aged 20 years or older were analyzed. According to the results of the analysis, the higher the level of life satisfaction, health status, and preparedness, the lower the possibility of being classified as a different type of anxious group than the non-anxious group. This study is significant in that it expanded Slovic's (1987) theory on risk perception and applied it to a Korean risk situation and analyzed it empirically.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Association of Governance Studies
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26847/mspa.2024.34.4.31
Primary Topic
Health and Wellbeing Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Types of Anxiety about Social Hazards: Focusing on Unusual and Everyday hazards

Cheon Geun Choi
The Korean Association of Governance Studies
Health and Wellbeing Research
article

Types of Anxiety about Social Hazards: Focusing on Unusual and Everyday hazards

Cheon Geun Choi
article en

Abstract

This study aims to classify anxiety attitudes toward social hazards using latent class analysis. By applying two dimensions of Solvic's (1987) psychometric study, dread and knowledge, social hazards were divided into unusual hazards (war, natural disasters, new diseases) and everyday hazards (fire, traffic accidents, food hygiene). Here, individuals can be classified into types of anxiety or no anxiety about all risks among the two types of social hazards, or types of anxiety about only one type of social hazard (anxiety, non-anxiety, unusual risk anxiety, everyday risk anxiety). Furthermore, a hypothesis was set up on how individual characteristics affect the process of being classified into four types of social anxiety. For verification, the ‘2022 Social Survey’ data from Statistics Korea was used, and 28,096 adults aged 20 years or older were analyzed. According to the results of the analysis, the higher the level of life satisfaction, health status, and preparedness, the lower the possibility of being classified as a different type of anxious group than the non-anxious group. This study is significant in that it expanded Slovic's (1987) theory on risk perception and applied it to a Korean risk situation and analyzed it empirically.

The Korean Association of Governance StudiesVol. 34(4)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Health and Wellbeing Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.