Pengaruh Konotasi Negatif Akronim Aplikasi Pemerintah dan Implikasinya terhadap Persepsi Publik: Studi Kasus 11 Aplikasi Pemerintah Indonesia

This study aims to investigate the impact of negative connotations in acronyms used by 11 Indonesian government applications. The research focuses on understanding public perception of these acronyms, especially those with vulgar and sexist connotations. The methodology includes a combination of observation and survey methods. Primary data were collected by recording acronyms from official government websites, while secondary data were obtained through a questionnaire survey with 60 respondents (38 females and 22 males). The results show that 52.4% of respondents are aware of these acronyms, and over 90% perceive them as vulgar. Moreover, more than half of the respondents find these acronyms inappropriate for public services, with 52.4% associating them with gender-specific sexual connotations. The study highlights the need for a more culturally sensitive approach in branding public services to avoid alienating the public.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23917/kls.v9i2.6445
Primary Topic
Education, Sociology, Communication Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pengaruh Konotasi Negatif Akronim Aplikasi Pemerintah dan Implikasinya terhadap Persepsi Publik: Studi Kasus 11 Aplikasi Pemerintah Indonesia

Nina Hayuningtyas, Siti Khodijah, Nur Lailatul Aqromi
Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra
Education, Sociology, Communication Studies
article

Pengaruh Konotasi Negatif Akronim Aplikasi Pemerintah dan Implikasinya terhadap Persepsi Publik: Studi Kasus 11 Aplikasi Pemerintah Indonesia

Nina Hayuningtyas, Siti Khodijah, Nur Lailatul Aqromi
article en

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of negative connotations in acronyms used by 11 Indonesian government applications. The research focuses on understanding public perception of these acronyms, especially those with vulgar and sexist connotations. The methodology includes a combination of observation and survey methods. Primary data were collected by recording acronyms from official government websites, while secondary data were obtained through a questionnaire survey with 60 respondents (38 females and 22 males). The results show that 52.4% of respondents are aware of these acronyms, and over 90% perceive them as vulgar. Moreover, more than half of the respondents find these acronyms inappropriate for public services, with 52.4% associating them with gender-specific sexual connotations. The study highlights the need for a more culturally sensitive approach in branding public services to avoid alienating the public.

Kajian Linguistik dan SastraVol. 9(2)
Universitas Islam Jember (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Education, Sociology, Communication Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.