Tasering Patients - A Bioethical Assessment of Taser Use Against Mental Health Inpatients in New Zealand.

Tasers, a form of police weaponry causing neuromuscular incapacitation and extreme pain, were confirmed in 2010 to be used in New Zealand inpatient mental health units. Their use on patients, or tāngata whai ora (persons seeking wellbeing), raises ethical concerns about harm prevention, moral duties, and human rights in healthcare. The New Zealand healthcare system, grounded in principles and rights, regulates procedures to uphold fundamental rights. This article explores the ethical justifications and criticisms of taser use in mental health wards from a principlist perspective. It questions the ethical limits of State power regarding non-maleficence, beneficence, and autonomy, arguing that tasers pose disproportionate harm to vulnerable patients and undermine ethical healthcare standards. Concerns are raised to promote policy development, monitoring, and reporting, aimed at addressing the ethical issues associated with taser use in mental health settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2024-11-01
Primary Topic
Restraint-Related Deaths
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tasering Patients - A Bioethical Assessment of Taser Use Against Mental Health Inpatients in New Zealand.

Christina Et Pikiuha-Billing
PubMed
Restraint-Related Deaths
article

Tasering Patients - A Bioethical Assessment of Taser Use Against Mental Health Inpatients in New Zealand.

Christina Et Pikiuha-Billing
article en

Abstract

Tasers, a form of police weaponry causing neuromuscular incapacitation and extreme pain, were confirmed in 2010 to be used in New Zealand inpatient mental health units. Their use on patients, or tāngata whai ora (persons seeking wellbeing), raises ethical concerns about harm prevention, moral duties, and human rights in healthcare. The New Zealand healthcare system, grounded in principles and rights, regulates procedures to uphold fundamental rights. This article explores the ethical justifications and criticisms of taser use in mental health wards from a principlist perspective. It questions the ethical limits of State power regarding non-maleficence, beneficence, and autonomy, arguing that tasers pose disproportionate harm to vulnerable patients and undermine ethical healthcare standards. Concerns are raised to promote policy development, monitoring, and reporting, aimed at addressing the ethical issues associated with taser use in mental health settings.

PubMedVol. 31(3)
University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Restraint-Related Deaths
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.