Deception and Fraud in the Justification of "Pediatric Drug Development": A Challenge at the Interface of Medicine and Law.

United States and European Union laws demand separate clinical studies in children as a condition for drugs' marketing approval. Justified by carefully framed pseudo-scientific wordings, more so the European Medicines Agency than the United States Food and Drug Administration, "Pediatric Drug Development" is probably the largest abuse in medical research in history. Preterm newborns are immature and vulnerable, but they grow. Adolescents are bodily no longer children. Younger children are not another species. Instead of reasonable dose-finding, most "pediatric" studies replicate at best what is known already; others withhold effective treatment and/or harm by substandard comparison, triggering "pediatric" drug labels and "pediatric" careers. Researching deception and fraud focuses currently on individuals. The mechanisms by which lawmakers and the public were and are deceived need elucidation in our increasingly complex society, including new types of conflicts of interest. Candidly addressing deception and fraud at the interface of medicine and law will help to unmask pseudoscience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2024-11-01
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deception and Fraud in the Justification of "Pediatric Drug Development": A Challenge at the Interface of Medicine and Law.

Klaus Rose, Emilio Russo, Earl Ettienne, Pasquale Striano et al.
5 citations
PubMed
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
5.55
article

Deception and Fraud in the Justification of "Pediatric Drug Development": A Challenge at the Interface of Medicine and Law.

Klaus Rose, Emilio Russo, Earl Ettienne, Pasquale Striano, Jane M Grant-Kels
article en
5 citations

Abstract

United States and European Union laws demand separate clinical studies in children as a condition for drugs' marketing approval. Justified by carefully framed pseudo-scientific wordings, more so the European Medicines Agency than the United States Food and Drug Administration, "Pediatric Drug Development" is probably the largest abuse in medical research in history. Preterm newborns are immature and vulnerable, but they grow. Adolescents are bodily no longer children. Younger children are not another species. Instead of reasonable dose-finding, most "pediatric" studies replicate at best what is known already; others withhold effective treatment and/or harm by substandard comparison, triggering "pediatric" drug labels and "pediatric" careers. Researching deception and fraud focuses currently on individuals. The mechanisms by which lawmakers and the public were and are deceived need elucidation in our increasingly complex society, including new types of conflicts of interest. Candidly addressing deception and fraud at the interface of medicine and law will help to unmask pseudoscience.

PubMedVol. 31(3)
Howard University (US), UConn Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
5.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.