Clinical characteristics of individuals stratified by the number of answered items on the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale.

The 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25) is a tool to identify locomotive syndrome, however, this tool is associated with the problem of a low complete response rate. We conducted this cross-sectional study of 2,474 community-dwelling residents to investigate the clinical characteristics of individuals who are prone to provide incomplete responses to the GLFS-25 questionnaire. The participants were divided into the following four groups based on the number of the GLFS-25 items they answered: 0 (n=279), 1-21 (n=36), 22-24 (n=273), and 25 (n=1,886). We investigated clinical characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, health consciousness, housemate status, smoking and drinking habits, physical activity level, the presence of body pain, and comorbidities. To achieve the study objective, we focused on a comparison of the clinical characteristics between the group of participants who answered 22-24 items (target group) and 0 items (control group). The participants who answered 22-24 items were older, more likely to be health-conscious, more likely to live alone, less likely to have lower levels of physical activity, and were more likely to report neck pain, low back pain, shoulder pain, elbow pain, wrist pain, hip pain, knee pain, ankle pain, and ophthalmic disease than those who answered 0 items. Among the significant factors, the only factor that can be changed to improve the number of answered items on the GLFS-25 is health consciousness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.86.4.578
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical characteristics of individuals stratified by the number of answered items on the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale.

Tadatsugu Morimoto, Rei Ono, Koji Otani, Masaaki Mawatari et al.
PubMed
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

Clinical characteristics of individuals stratified by the number of answered items on the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale.

Tadatsugu Morimoto, Rei Ono, Koji Otani, Masaaki Mawatari, Takaomi Kobayashi, Chisato Shimanoe
article en

Abstract

The 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25) is a tool to identify locomotive syndrome, however, this tool is associated with the problem of a low complete response rate. We conducted this cross-sectional study of 2,474 community-dwelling residents to investigate the clinical characteristics of individuals who are prone to provide incomplete responses to the GLFS-25 questionnaire. The participants were divided into the following four groups based on the number of the GLFS-25 items they answered: 0 (n=279), 1-21 (n=36), 22-24 (n=273), and 25 (n=1,886). We investigated clinical characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, health consciousness, housemate status, smoking and drinking habits, physical activity level, the presence of body pain, and comorbidities. To achieve the study objective, we focused on a comparison of the clinical characteristics between the group of participants who answered 22-24 items (target group) and 0 items (control group). The participants who answered 22-24 items were older, more likely to be health-conscious, more likely to live alone, less likely to have lower levels of physical activity, and were more likely to report neck pain, low back pain, shoulder pain, elbow pain, wrist pain, hip pain, knee pain, ankle pain, and ophthalmic disease than those who answered 0 items. Among the significant factors, the only factor that can be changed to improve the number of answered items on the GLFS-25 is health consciousness.

PubMedVol. 86(4)
Fukushima Medical University (JP), Saga University (JP), Kobe University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.