Deconstruction at the Time of Post-Truth Politics

Abstract Deconstructionist depiction of fictionality within the relationship between truth and sovereignty helps to understand how time relates to post-truth politics and to counter its proliferation within politics. The article connects the philosophical arguments of Jacques Derrida and Giorgio Agamben to explore the pervasive nature of post-truth within politics. Their differing conceptualisations of the place of time are both fundamentally rooted in the ontological problem of sovereignty, though they yield significantly different implications for post-truth politics. Derrida’s deconstruction of the temporal dimension in politics highlights the intricate relationship between the temporal and epistemological aspects inherent in the fictional narratives reinforced by sovereignty—narratives that fuel post-truth politics. This approach contrasts Agamben’s archaeological political theory, which reveals fictionality by subsuming sovereignty over time. This illuminates the epistemic challenges posed by post-truth politics and contends that deconstructionist epistemological standards are essential heuristics to counter the rise and proliferation of post-truth politics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Subjectivity
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-024-00204-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deconstruction at the Time of Post-Truth Politics

Elia R.G. Pusterla
2 citations
Subjectivity
Social Policy and Reform Studies
4.46
article

Deconstruction at the Time of Post-Truth Politics

Elia R.G. Pusterla
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Deconstructionist depiction of fictionality within the relationship between truth and sovereignty helps to understand how time relates to post-truth politics and to counter its proliferation within politics. The article connects the philosophical arguments of Jacques Derrida and Giorgio Agamben to explore the pervasive nature of post-truth within politics. Their differing conceptualisations of the place of time are both fundamentally rooted in the ontological problem of sovereignty, though they yield significantly different implications for post-truth politics. Derrida’s deconstruction of the temporal dimension in politics highlights the intricate relationship between the temporal and epistemological aspects inherent in the fictional narratives reinforced by sovereignty—narratives that fuel post-truth politics. This approach contrasts Agamben’s archaeological political theory, which reveals fictionality by subsuming sovereignty over time. This illuminates the epistemic challenges posed by post-truth politics and contends that deconstructionist epistemological standards are essential heuristics to counter the rise and proliferation of post-truth politics.

SubjectivityVol. 31(4)
University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (CH), Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT)
Libera Università di Bolzano
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.