Heart or Grace Score for Diagnostic and Risk Stratification in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients

Some studies found that HEART score is better than GRACE score either as a rule-in method for myocardial infarction or as a risk stratification. However, GRACE score was also found to have better discriminatory ability as a prognostic model for patients with myocardial infarction. This study aims to evaluate whether the HEART and GRACE scores have equal capabilities either as a diagnostic method for myocardial infarction or risk stratification to predict inhospital Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients at Adam Malik Hospital. This research is a retrospective and prospective observational study. Retrospective data was collected from all medical records of ACS patients from January to December 2022. Prospective data was collected by consecutive sampling until 46 samples were fulfilled from October 2023 at Adam Malik Hospital. Samples included in the research analysis were those who met the inclusion criteria. To compare each score, we use the area under the receiver-operating characteristics (AUC) method. As a conclusion, we found that HEART score is superior to GRACE score as a diagnostic method with an AUC of 0.903, a cutoff of 6.5, sensitivity of 86%, and specificity of 80%. The GRACE score is superior to the HEART score as a risk stratification with an AUC of 0.719, a cutoff of 128.5, a sensitivity of 66%, and a specificity of 65%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sumatera Medical Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32734/sumej.v8i1.17168
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heart or Grace Score for Diagnostic and Risk Stratification in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients

Friendina Napitupulu
2 citations
Sumatera Medical Journal
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
2.78
article

Heart or Grace Score for Diagnostic and Risk Stratification in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients

Friendina Napitupulu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Some studies found that HEART score is better than GRACE score either as a rule-in method for myocardial infarction or as a risk stratification. However, GRACE score was also found to have better discriminatory ability as a prognostic model for patients with myocardial infarction. This study aims to evaluate whether the HEART and GRACE scores have equal capabilities either as a diagnostic method for myocardial infarction or risk stratification to predict inhospital Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients at Adam Malik Hospital. This research is a retrospective and prospective observational study. Retrospective data was collected from all medical records of ACS patients from January to December 2022. Prospective data was collected by consecutive sampling until 46 samples were fulfilled from October 2023 at Adam Malik Hospital. Samples included in the research analysis were those who met the inclusion criteria. To compare each score, we use the area under the receiver-operating characteristics (AUC) method. As a conclusion, we found that HEART score is superior to GRACE score as a diagnostic method with an AUC of 0.903, a cutoff of 6.5, sensitivity of 86%, and specificity of 80%. The GRACE score is superior to the HEART score as a risk stratification with an AUC of 0.719, a cutoff of 128.5, a sensitivity of 66%, and a specificity of 65%.

Sumatera Medical JournalVol. 8(1)
Universitas Sumatera Utara (ID)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.